Skip to main content
  1. Right Decisions
  2. Maternity & Gynaecology Guidelines
  3. Maternity
  4. Back
  5. Infections
  6. Group B Streptococcal Prophylaxis (570)
Announcements and latest updates

Right Decision Service newsletter: September 2024

Welcome to the Right Decision Service (RDS) newsletter for September 2024.

1.Business case for permanent provision of the Right Decision Service from April 2025 onwards

This business case has now been endorsed by the HIS Board and will shortly be submitted to Scottish Government.

2. Management of RDS support tickets

To balance increasing demand with available capacity and financial resource, the RDS team and Tactuum are now working together to  implement closer management of support tickets. As a key part of this, we want to ensure clear, timely and consistent communication with yourselves as requesters.  

Editors will now start seeing new messages come through in response to support ticket requests which reflect this tightening up and improvement of our processes.

Key points to note are:

2.1 Issues confirmed by the RDS and Tactuum teams as meeting the critical/urgent and high priority criteria will continue to be prioritised and dealt with immediately.

Critical/urgent issues are defined as:

  1. The Service as a whole is not operational for multiple users. OR
  2. Multiple core functions of the Service are not operational for multiple users.

Example – RDS website outage.

Please remember to email ann.wales3@nhs.scot and his.decisionsupport@nhs.scot with any critical/urgent issues in addition to raising a support ticket.

High priority issues are defined as:

  1. A single core function of the Service is not operational for multiple users. OR:
  2. Multiple non-core functions of the Service are not operational for multiple users.

Example – Build to app not working.

2.2 Support requests that are outwith the warranty period of 12 weeks since the software was originally developed will not be automatically addressed by Tactuum. The RDS team will consider these requests for costed development work and will obtain estimate of effort and cost from Tactuum for priority issues.

2.3 Support tickets for technical issues that are not classified as bugs will not be automatically addressed by Tactuum. The definition of a bug is ‘a defect in the software that is at variance with documented user requirements.’  Issues that are not bugs will also be considered for costed development work.

The majority of issues currently in support tickets fall into category 2 or 3 above, or both.

2.4 Non-urgent requests that require a deployment (i.e a new release of RDS) will normally be factored into the next scheduled release (currently end of Nov 2024 and end of Feb 2025) unless by special agreement with the RDS team.

Please note that we plan to move in the new year to a new system whereby requests all come to an RDS support portal in the first instance and are triaged from there to Tactuum when appropriate.

We will be organising a webinar in a few weeks’ time to take you through the details of the current support processes and criteria.

3. Next scheduled deployment.

The next scheduled RDS deployment will take place at the end of November 2024.  We are reviewing all outstanding support tickets and feature requests along with estimates of effort and cost to determine which items will be included in this deployment.

We will update you on this in the next newsletter and in the planned webinar about support ticket processes.

4. Contingency arrangements for RDS

Many thanks to those of you who attended our recent webinar on the contingency arrangements being put in place to prevent future RDS outages as far as possible and minimise impact if they do occur.  Please contact ann.wales3@nhs.scot if you would like a copy of the slides from this session.

5. Transfer of CKP pathways to RDS

The NES clinical knowledge pathway (CKP) publisher is now retired and the majority of pathways supported by this tool have been transferred to the RDS. Examples include:

NHS Lothian musculoskeletal pathways

NHS Fife rehabilitation musculoskeletal pathways

NHS Tayside paediatric pathways

6. Other new RDS toolkits

Include:

Focus on frailty (from HIS Frailty improvement programme)

NHS GGC Money advice and support

If you would like to promote one of your new toolkits through this newsletter, please contact ann.wales3@nhs.scot

To go live imminently:

  • Focus on dementia
  • NHS Lothian infectious diseases toolkit
  • Dumfries and Galloway Adult Support and Protection procedures
  • SIGN guideline – Prevention and remission of type 2 diabetes

 

7. Evaluation projects

We have recently analysed the results of a survey of users of the Scottish Palliative Care Guidelines toolkit.  Key findings from 61 respondents include:

  • Most respondents (64%) are frequent users of the toolkit, using it either daily or weekly. A further 25% use it once or twice per month.
  • 5% of respondents use the toolkit to deliver direct patient care and 82% use it for learning
  • Impact on practice and decision-making was rated as very high, with 80% of respondents rating these at a 4-5 on a 5 point scale.
  • Impact on time saving was also high, with 74% of respondents rating it from 3-5.
  • 74% also reported that the toolkit improved their knowledge and skills, rating these at 4-5 on the Likert scale

Key strengths identified included:

  • The information is useful, succinct, and easy to understand (31%).
  • Coverage is comprehensive (15%)
  • All information is readily accessible in one place and users value the offline access via mobile app (15%)
  • Information is reliable, evidence-based and up to date (13%)

Users highlighted key areas for improvement in terms of navigation and search functionality. The survey was very valuable in enabling us to uncover the specific issues affecting the user experience. Many of these can be addressed through content management approaches. The issues identified with search results echo other user feedback, and we are costing improvements with a view to implementation in the next RDS deployment.

8.RDS High risk prescribing (polypharmacy) decision support embedded in Vision and EMIS primary care E H R systems

This decision support software, sponsored by Scottish Government Effective Prescribing and Therapeutics Division,  is now available for all primary care clinicians across NHS Tayside. Board-wide implementation is also planned for NHS Lothian, and NHS GGC, NHS Ayrshire and Arran and NHS Dumfries and Galloway have initial pilots in progress. The University of Dundee has been commissioned to evaluate impact of this decision support software on prescribing practice.

9. Video tutorials for RDS editors

Ten bite-size (5 mins or less) video tutorials for RDS editors are now available in the “Resources for providers of RDS tools” section of the RDS.  These cover core functionality including Save and preview, content page and media management, password management and much more.

10. Training sessions for new editors (also serve as refresher sessions for existing editors) will take place on the following dates:

  • Wednesday 23rd October 4-5 pm
  • Tuesday 29th October 11 am -12 pm

To book a place, please contact Olivia.graham@nhs.scot, providing your name, organisation, job role, and level of experience with RDS editing (none, a little, moderate, extensive.)

If you have any questions about the content of this newsletter, please contact his.decisionsupport@nhs.scot  

With kind regards

 

Right Decision Service team

Healthcare Improvement Scotland

 

 

 

Group B Streptococcal Prophylaxis (570)

Warning

Audience

This guideline is applicable to all medical, nursing in midwifery staff caring for women and neonates in Greater Glasgow & Clyde. Staff should also be familiar with the relevant drug monographs.

Please report any inaccuracies or issues with this guideline using our online form

Introduction

Group B streptococcus is the commonest cause of early onset infection in the neonatal period. The organism frequently colonises the lower vagina or anorectum and may pass to the baby following rupture of the membranes, or occasionally prior to membrane rupture in the presence of amnionitis. This guideline aims to interrupt the transmission of GBS by giving intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis to the mother. Two approaches have been used to identify mothers who should be offered intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis. Mothers may be identified through routine bacteriological screening during the pregnancy or based on clinical risk factors for transmission of the organism. In the UK the Royal College of Obstetricians recommends the latter approach.

In 2012, NICE published guidance on antibiotics for the prevention and treatment of early onset neonatal infection (NICE CG149). This includes advice on maternal risk factors which warrant the use of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis. It also includes advice on the management of babies born to mothers with intrapartum risk factors, or where there are abnormal signs or symptoms in the baby, indicating an increased risk of early onset infection (including with Group B Streptococcus). All such babies are monitored using a Neonatal Early Warning Screening (NEWS) chart and some will receive antibiotics if there are multiple risk factors, signs or symptoms, or any single “red flag” risk factor, sign or symptom. This is all detailed in the neonatal Early Onset Sepsis (EOS) guideline.

Antenatal care

All pregnant women should be provided with an appropriate information leaflet regarding GBS.

Universal bacteriological screening is not recommended. A maternal request for screening is not an indication, but should be discussed with healthcare professionals on an individual basis.

Antenatal treatment is not recommended for GBS cultured from a vaginal or rectal swab. Women with GBS urinary tract infection (> 10cfu/ml) during pregnancy should receive appropriate treatment at the time of diagnosis, as well as intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis.

Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP)

1– Prophylaxis cases

The following groups of women should be offered IAP with an intravenous antibiotic which is effective against GBS. This will be benzylpenicillin or, for penicillin sensitive women, teicoplanin.

  • Women in whom colonisation with GBS has been identified in current or previous pregnancy
  • Women with GBS bacteriuria in current or previous pregnancy
  • Women with previous baby affected by early- or late-onset neonatal GBS disease
  • Women in confirmed preterm labour< 37+0 weeks gestation

Women with GBS detected in a previous pregnancy have a 50% risk of recurrent GBS carriage and should be offered routine IAP or the option of bacteriological testing in late pregnancy, followed by IAP if still positive.

If performed, bacteriological testing should be carried out at 35-37 weeks gestation or 3-5 weeks prior to the anticipated delivery date, i.e. 32-34 weeks gestation in multiple pregnancies. A single (Amies charcoal) swab should be taken from the lower vagina and anorectum. Healthcare professionals should indicate that the swab is being taken for GBS.

2– Potentially infected women who require antibiotics that also cover GBS

In women:

  • Where chorioamnionitis is suspected
  • Who have a pyrexia during labour (> 38°C) or a temperature of ≥ 37.5°C on 2 separate occasions at least 2 hours apart or maternal sepsis with a temperature < 36°C
  • For whom the sepsis 6 bundle is triggered

Antibiotic therapy should be according to GGC guidelines but in addition, must include specific GBSprophylaxis as below.

Intrapartum prophylaxis

(to start at the onset of labour)

Benzylpenicillin 3 g IV loading infusion over 30 minutes followed every 4 hours by 1.8 g IV infusion over 30 minutes until delivery. For women who have a genuine allergy to penicillin, give Teicoplanin 12 mg/kg * over 3-5 minutes as a slow IV bolus or over 30 minutes by IV infusion every 12 hours until delivery. (See Appendix 1)

* based on most recent body weight – round each dose to nearest 100 mg (max 800 mg)

Antibiotic therapy for women with suspected chorioamnionitis, intrapartum pyrexia or sepsis should be reviewed at delivery and/or after a maximum of 48 hours.

Clinicians should be aware of the potential adverse effects of IAP including anaphylaxis.

Effective prophylaxis

Prophylaxis is more effective if the first dose is given at least 4 hours prior to delivery and continued at the correct intervals. Antibiotics should be started as soon as possible after the onset of labour and continued until delivery. Prophylaxis is considered to have lapsed if a dose is more than 1 hour late. If prophylaxis with benzylpenicillin has lapsed a 3g loading dose is required rather than the routine 1.8g dose.

NB – As the primary goal of IAP is to prevent transmission of GBS to the neonate, it is vital to give effective prophylaxis even if the baby will receive antibiotics after delivery due to the presence of other risk factors for early onset sepsis.

Women who are receiving prophylactic antibiotics for GBS in labour who require a caesarean section will still require routine co-amoxiclav or clindamycin cover  (See antibiotic guideline).

Irrespective of gestation and the presence of risk factors for GBS transmission, IAP is not required if delivery is by planned caesarean section with intact membranes and the baby is clinically well.

 

Management of rupture of membranes to reduce the risk of GBS transmission

Women with rupture of membranes at term (≥ 37+0 weeks gestation) who are known GBS carriers should be offered immediate IAP and induction of labour as soon as reasonably possible.

Bacteriological testing for GBS carriage is not recommended for women with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes. IAP should be given once labour is confirmed or induced irrespective of GBS status. However, known GBS colonisation should be taken into consideration when making decisions about timing of delivery in women with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes. For those at more than 34+0 weeks of gestation it may be beneficial to expedite delivery if the woman is a known GBS carrier.

Communication

It  will  be  the  responsibility  of  the  labour ward  staff  to  communicate  to  the neonatologist  the following information:

  • That risk factors for early onset neonatal GBS disease have been identified
  • Whether prophylaxis has been started and, if so, how long prior to delivery
  • Whether there is evidence of maternal sepsis

The requirement for prophylaxis should be recorded on the alert area in the maternal notes.
Remember if mother is septic ensure neonatologist informed.

Frequently asked questions (FAQ)

Parents who decline intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis or empirical treatment for their baby

We recommend GBS prophylaxis. Intrapartum prophylaxis may be declined despite this advice. Empirical therapy for well infants born to mothers with risk factors may also be declined.

If parents decline these interventions the medical staff should ensure that they are aware of the level of risk of early onset GBS disease and the life threatening nature of GBS sepsis. The infant should remain in hospital for at least 24 hours and observations of temperature, pulse and respiratory rate performed 3 hourly and recorded on a NEWS chart.

GBS prophylaxis is offered by maternity staff to the mother and this must be adequately explained. If the clinician is unable to answer any queries then a relevant professional should be asked to address any concerns. This should conclude with a decision as to whether prophylaxis is accepted or declined and this must be clearly documented.

When prophylaxis or empirical treatment is declined by informed parents, this should be documented. It is not appropriate to suggest or instigate child protection proceedings.

The baby should be monitored on a NEWS chart and treated with antibiotics if abnormal clinical signs or symptoms are identified (refer to EOS guideline for details). Parents may not decline therapy for their baby if signs or symptoms of infection are present.

Appendix 1 Teicoplanin Dose Banding for GBS Prophylaxis

  Most recent weight   Dose (mg)
  Less than 36 kg   400mg
  36 - 45.9 kg   500mg
  46 - 53.9 kg   600mg
  54 - 61.9 kg   700mg
  62 kg or above   800mg

Editorial Information

Last reviewed: 19/02/2019

Next review date: 23/05/2024

Author(s): Ann Duncan.

Approved By: Obstetrics Clinical Governance Group

Document Id: 570

References

RCOG. Prevention of early-onset neonatal group B streptococcal disease. [Green-top Guideline No 36] September 2017.

NICE. Antibiotics for early-onset neonatal infection. [CG149] August 2012.