Skip to main content
  1. Right Decisions
  2. Maternity & Gynaecology Guidelines
  3. Gynaecology
  4. Gynaecology guidelines
  5. Back
  6. Guidelines A-Z (all Gynaecology guidelines)
  7. Surgical Management of First Trimester Miscarriage (894)
Important: please update your RDS app to version 4.7.3

Welcome to the March 2025 update from the RDS team

1.     RDS issues - resolutions

1.1 Stability issues - Tactuum implemented a fix on 24th March which we believe has finally addressed the stability issues experienced over recent weeks.  The issue seems to have been related to the new “Tool export” function making repeated calls for content when new toolkit nodes were opened in Umbraco. No outages have been reported since then, and no performance issues in the logs, so fingers crossed this is now resolved.

1.2 Toolkit URL redirects failing– these were restored manually for the antimicrobial calculators on the 13th March when the issue occurred, and by 15th March for the remainder. The root cause was traced to adding a new hostname for an app migrated from another health board and made live that day. This led to the content management system automatically creating internal duplicate redirects, reaching the maximum number of permitted redirects and most redirects therefore ceasing to function.

This issue should not happen again because:

  • All old apps are now fully migrated to RDS. The large number of migrations has contributed to the high number of automated redirects.
  • If there is any need to change hostnames in future, Tactuum will immediately check for duplicates.

1.3 Gentamicin calculators – Incidents have been reported incidents of people accessing the wrong gentamicin calculator for their health board.  This occurs when clinicians are searching for the gentamicin calculator via an online search engine - e.g. Google - rather than via the health board directed policy route. When accessed via an external search engine, the calculator results are not listed by health board, and the start page for the calculator does not make it clearly visible which health board calculator has been selected.

The Scottish Antimicrobial Prescribing Group has asked health boards to provide targeted communication and education to ensure that clinicians know how to access their health board antimicrobial calculators via the RDS, local Intranet or other local policy route. In terms of RDS amendments, it is not currently possible to change the internet search output, so the following changes are now in progress:

  • The health board name will now be displayed within the calculator and it will be made clear which boards are using the ‘Hartford’ (7mg/kg) higher dose calculator
  • Warning text will be added to the calculator to advise that more than one calculator is in use in NHS Scotland and that clinicians should ensure they access the correct one for their health board. A link to the Right Decision Service list of health board antimicrobial prescribing toolkits will be included with the warning text. Users can then access the correct calculator for their Board via the appropriate toolkit.

We would encourage all editors and users to use the Help and Support standard operating procedure and the Editors’ Teams channel to highlight issues, even if you think they may be temporary or already noted. This helps the RDS team to get a full picture of concerns and issues across the service.

 

2.     New RDS presentation – RDS supporting the patient journey

A new presentation illustrating how RDS supports all partners in the patient journey – multiple disciplines across secondary, primary, community and social care settings – as well as patients and carers through self-management and shared decision-making tools – is now available. You will find it in the Promotion and presentation resources for editors section of the Learning and support toolkit.

3.     User guides

A new user guide is now available in the Guidance and tips section of Resources for providers within the Learning and Support area, explaining how to embed content from Google Calendar, Google Maps, Daily Motion, Twitter feeds, Microsoft Stream and Jotforms into RDS pages. A webinar for editors on using this new functionality is scheduled for 1 May 3-4 pm (booking information below.)

A new checklist to support editors in making all the checks required before making a new toolkit live is now available at the foot of the “Request a new toolkit” standard operating procedure. Completing this checklist is not a mandatory part of the governance process, but we would encourage you to use it to make sure all the critical issues are covered at point of launch – including organisational tags, use of Alias URLs and editorial information.

4.Training sessions for RDS editors

Introductory webinars for RDS editors will take place on:

  • Tuesday 29th April 4-5 pm
  • Thursday 1st May 4-5 pm

Special webinar for RDS editors – 1 May 3-4 pm

This webinar will cover:

  1. a) Use of the new left hand navigation option for RDS toolkits.
  2. b) Integration into RDS pages of content from external sources, including Google Calendar, Google Maps and simple Jotforms calculators.

Running usage statistics reports using Google analytics

  • Wednesday 23rd April 2pm-3pm
  • Thursday 22nd May 2pm-3pm

To book a place on any of these webinars, please contact Olivia.graham@nhs.scot providing your name, role, organisation, title and date of the webinar you wish to attend.

5.New RDS toolkits

The following toolkits were launched during March 2025:

SIGN guideline - Prevention and remission of type 2 diabetes

Valproate – easy read version for people with learning disabilities (Scottish Government Medicines Division)

Obstetrics and gynaecology induction toolkit (NHS Lothian) – password-protected, in pilot stage.

Oral care for care home and care at home services (Public Health Scotland)

Postural care in care homes (NHS Lothian)

Quit Your Way Pregnancy Service (NHS GGC)

 

6.New RDS developments

Release of the redesign of RDS search and browse, archiving and version control functionality, and editing capability for shared content, is now provisionally scheduled for early June.

The Scottish Government Realistic Medicine Policy team is leading development of a national approach to implementation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) as a key objective within the Value Based Health and Care Action Plan. The Right Decision Service has been commissioned to deliver an initial version of a platform for issuing PROMs questionnaires to patients, making the PROMs reports available from patient record systems, and providing an analytics dashboard to compare outcomes across services.  This work is now underway and we will keep you updated on progress.

The RDS team has supported Scottish Government Effective Prescribing and Therapeutics Division, in partnership with Northern Ireland and Republic of Ireland, in a successful bid for EU funding to test develop, implement and assess new integrated care pathways for polypharmacy, including pharmacogenomics. As part of this project, the RDS will be working with NHS Tayside to test extending the current polypharmacy RDS decision support in the Vision primary care electronic health record system to include pharmacogenomics decision support.

7. Implementation projects

We have just completed a series of three workshops consulting on proposed improvements to the Being a partner in my care: Realistic Medicine together app, following piloting on 10 sites in late 2024. This app has been commissioned by Scottish Government Realistic Medicine to support patients and citizens to become active partners in shared decision-making and encouraging personalised care based on outcomes that matter to the person. We are keen to gather more feedback on this app. Please forward any feedback to ann.wales3@nhs.scot

 

 

Surgical Management of First Trimester Miscarriage (894)

Warning

Please report any inaccuracies or issues with this guideline using our online form

Surgical evacuation is considered to be a safe and effective management option in first trimester pregnancy loss.

Surgical evacuation of uterus can be offered to women with a non continuing pregnancy at ≤13 weeks gestation. 

Where clinically appropriate, offer women a choice of manual vacuum aspiration under local anaesthetic (see MVA guideline), or surgical management in an operating theatre under general anaesthetic 2.

Surgical management of miscarriage (SMM) should be the first line-treatment for 2:

  • persistent excessive bleeding
  • haemodynamic instability
  • evidence of infected retained tissue
  • suspected gestational trophoblastic disease

Provide oral and written information to all women about the treatment options available and what to expect during and after the procedure 3.

The intended benefits and risks of the procedure and any extra procedures that may become necessary should be discussed. 

Written consent should be taken by a health professional familiar with the procedure.

Women who are obese, who have significant pre-existing medical conditions or who have had previous surgery must be made aware that the quoted risks for serious or frequent complications may be increased 2.

If the woman wishes to avoid a pregnancy after the procedure, sensitively counsel the woman regarding contraceptive options. SMM can be an opportunity for the insertion of intrauterine contraception. If the woman wishes this, additional consent should be obtained 2.

  • Discuss and +/- obtain consent for Pathology 1 and sensitive disposal of fetal remains 4. Ensure completion of the appropriate paperwork.
  • Offer Chlamydia screening to all women. If screening is accepted, women should be instructed on how to obtain a low vaginal swab.

Anaesthetic pre-assessment should be performed to determine the patient’s suitability for a surgical procedure, and to identify risk factors. Where any increased risk factors or contraindications are identified, discussion with, or review by, the clinician / anaesthetist should be arranged as appropriate. 

Obtain baseline full blood count (FBC) and group and save (G&S). In addition, perform any other relevant investigation as indicated by patient clinical history.

Women with a BMI ≥ 30, a history of peptic ulceration or indigestion should receive prophylactic oral Omeprazole 20mg at 22.00hrs on the evening prior to surgery and repeated at 07.00hrs on the morning of surgery 5, 6 or as indicated by local Patient Group Directive.

  • Determine change in clinical condition since pre-assessment. If, in the interim, there has been significant PV loss, consider rescan to confirm that surgical evacuation is still the most appropriate management option.
  • Complete admission portion of Assessment Booklet as locally indicated.
  • Administer Misoprostol 400 micrograms vaginally 3 hours prior to surgery OR sublingually 2–3 hours prior to surgery. (Refer to Appendix ‘Cervical Priming Guidance’ for caution / exclusion criteria).

Antibiotic prophylaxis should be offered using the following regimen7:   

  • All women should be offered Metronidazole 800mg administered orally 2 hours pre-operatively.

IF

  • Chlamydia NEGATIVE - no further antibiotics required.
  • Chlamydia POSITIVE - Doxycycline 100mg orally 12 hourly for 7 days post-op is the first line treatment.
  • Offer Azithromycin 1g orally as a single dose followed by 500mg daily for 2 days where chlamydia screening is declined, or in individuals who are allergic to or intolerant of tetracyclines 8.

Bleeding at the time of the procedure or shortly after can be caused by uterine atony, coagulopathy or abnormal placentation, OR by complications such as uterine perforation, cervical laceration and retained pregnancy tissue2

If there is unexpected heavy bleeding at the time of surgery it should alert the surgeon to the possibility of gestational trophoblastic disease and in a woman with a history of caesarean section, a previously undiagnosed caesarean scar pregnancy2.

Management of uterine perforation will depend on the instruments used2

  • If a perforation occurs when using a dilator or curette then conservative management with antibiotics, observation and explanation to the patient may be appropriate.
  • If larger diameter instruments or a suction curette is used, or if there is significant revealed bleeding, then laparoscopy should be performed.

  • Observation of blood pressure and pulse should be monitored as per Early Warning Chart or as clinically indicated.
  • Assessment of pain levels and vaginal blood loss at least 1hourly or as clinically indicated.
  • Discharge may be 2 hrs post-operatively or when local Day Surgery discharge criteria are fulfilled9.
  • Non-sensitised rhesus (Rh) negative women should receive anti-D immunoglobulin where the uterus has been surgically evacuated1.
  • Ensure patient receives appropriate discharge information. Where possible, this information should be given in written form.
  • Ensure women and their families have an awareness of, and access to, appropriate support and counselling services.
  • Arrange appropriate follow up based on individual needs.
  • Inform all relevant primary care professionals of pregnancy outcome and management.

Introduction

Cervical priming with misoprostol (an E1 prostaglandin analogue) prior to surgical management of miscarriage (SMM) aims to reduce the possibility of injury to the uterus and cervix, and to improve the surgical ease of the procedure2.

It should be noted that although cervical priming has been shown to reduce both the need for mechanical dilation and the operating time, there have been no studies confirming a reduction in cervical or uterine injury2

Criteria

Cervical priming should be administered to all patients with a non-continuing pregnancy ≤12+0 gestation (CRL 65 mms or less), who wish surgical uterine evacuation and who have no contraindication to misoprostol administration.  

Patients with an incomplete miscarriage do not require any cervical preparation as the cervix is already dilated to a degree. 

Exclusion criteria

Severe asthma not controlled by therapy10

Known hypersensitivity to misoprostol or any component of the product11

Caution 

  • If aged >35yrs and a smoker.12
  • In patients with a history of cerebrovascular or cardiovascular disease.13
  • In patients with haemorrhagic conditions or on anticoagulation therapy.11
  • In patients with conditions that predispose them to diarrhoea, such as inflammatory bowel disease14.

Management. 

Misoprostol 400micrograms administered 15, 16, 17

  • vaginally 3 hours prior to surgery OR
  • sublingually 2–3 hours prior to surgery

Practitioners may consider oral or vaginal cervical preparation based on individual patient circumstance. 

Women may self-administer the vaginal tablets if preferred, without compromising efficacy15.

Misoprostol administered via the sublingual route is superior to vaginal administration but is associated with more gastrointestinal adverse effects15.  

Vaginal administration: Misoprostol 400 micrograms (2 x 200 micrograms tablets) in a single dose should be placed in the posterior fornix of the cervix and allowed to dissolve. Patient should therefore be advised to lie in semi recumbent position for 30 minutes post administration. 

Sublingual administration: Misoprostol 400 micrograms (2 x 200 micrograms tablets) in a single dose should be placed in the buccal pouch and allowed to dissolve over a 15 minute period. If not dissolved within this timeframe it may be swallowed with small sip of water.

Possible short term side effects 14, 18 usually in the several hours following administration:  

  • Abdominal cramp
  • PV bleeding
  • Nausea and/or vomiting (may affect the efficacy of the drug if it occurs within two hours of administration).
  • Diarrhoea or constipation
  • Headache
  • Rash
  • Malaise
  • Transient chills, shivering and fever
  • Dizziness

Post administration

Patient observation and assessment to ensure early identification of adverse reaction.  

Guidelines will be updated periodically to incorporate results of local audit and published literature. 

Editorial Information

Last reviewed: 03/12/2020

Next review date: 31/12/2025

Author(s): Claire Higgins.

Approved By: Gynaecology Clinical Governance Group

Document Id: 894

References
  1. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Green-Top Guideline No. 25. The Management of Early Pregnancy Loss. October 2006.
  2. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (Joint with AEPU), Consent Advice No.10, Surgical Management of Miscarriage and Removal of Persistent Placental or Fetal Remains. January 2018.
  3. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Clinical guideline 54, Ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage: diagnosis and initial management, December 2012, 1.5.19.
  4. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Disposal Following Pregnancy Loss Before 24 Weeks of Gestation. Good Practice Guideline No. 5. London: RCOG; 2005.
  5. British National Formulary (BNF). March 2008; 46:1.3.1.
  6. A.D, Brockutne J.W. Protection against pulmonary acid aspiration with Ranitidine. A new H2-receptor antagonist. Anaesthesia. 1982; 37: (1) 22-25.
  7. NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde Recommendation for antibiotic prophylaxis in Gynaecological Procedures. February 2020. 
  8. British Association for Sexual Health and HIV. Clinical Effectiveness Group, Update on the treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis infection. September 2018.
  9. I. Keston. Consultant Anaesthetist. The Queen Mother’s Hospital, Glasgow. Personal communication.
  10. Medical Abortion: A Fact Sheet. Reproduction Health Matters 2005; 13(26): 20
  11. Meuleman C, Jourdain P, Bellorini M, et al. Anaphylactic shock and myocytic necrosis after treatment with Artotec. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss 2002; 95:1230-3.
  12. Walch L, Labat C, Gascard JP, de Montreville V, Brink C, Norel X. Prostanoid receptors involved in the relaxation of human pulmonary vessels. Br J Pharm-col 1999;126:859-66
  13. Davey, A. Mifepristone and prostaglandin for termination of pregnancy: contraindications for use, reasons and rationale. Contraception 2006; 74: 20-4.
  14. https://bnf.nice.org.uk/drug/misoprostol.html#contraIndications
  15. RCOG The Care of Women Requesting Induced Abortion. Evidence-based Clinical Guideline Number 7. The Care of Women Requesting Induced Abortion. Nov 2011; 7.1.
  16. World Health Organisation. Safe abortion: technical and policy guidance for health systems. Second edition. 2012; 2.2.1.
  17. Singh K & Fong FY. Preparation of the cervix for surgical termination of pregnancy in the first trimester. Hum Reprod Update 2000; 6: 442–448.
  18. Exelgyn SmPC, Excelgyn Laboratories, France. 2006; 6:4.8