Skip to main content
  1. Right Decisions
  2. Maternity & Gynaecology Guidelines
  3. Gynaecology
  4. Gynaecology guidelines
  5. Back
  6. Guidelines A-Z (all Gynaecology guidelines)
  7. Obesity in Gynaecology (587)
Important: please update your RDS app to version 4.7.3

Welcome to the March 2025 update from the RDS team

1.     RDS issues - resolutions

1.1 Stability issues - Tactuum implemented a fix on 24th March which we believe has finally addressed the stability issues experienced over recent weeks.  The issue seems to have been related to the new “Tool export” function making repeated calls for content when new toolkit nodes were opened in Umbraco. No outages have been reported since then, and no performance issues in the logs, so fingers crossed this is now resolved.

1.2 Toolkit URL redirects failing– these were restored manually for the antimicrobial calculators on the 13th March when the issue occurred, and by 15th March for the remainder. The root cause was traced to adding a new hostname for an app migrated from another health board and made live that day. This led to the content management system automatically creating internal duplicate redirects, reaching the maximum number of permitted redirects and most redirects therefore ceasing to function.

This issue should not happen again because:

  • All old apps are now fully migrated to RDS. The large number of migrations has contributed to the high number of automated redirects.
  • If there is any need to change hostnames in future, Tactuum will immediately check for duplicates.

1.3 Gentamicin calculators – Incidents have been reported incidents of people accessing the wrong gentamicin calculator for their health board.  This occurs when clinicians are searching for the gentamicin calculator via an online search engine - e.g. Google - rather than via the health board directed policy route. When accessed via an external search engine, the calculator results are not listed by health board, and the start page for the calculator does not make it clearly visible which health board calculator has been selected.

The Scottish Antimicrobial Prescribing Group has asked health boards to provide targeted communication and education to ensure that clinicians know how to access their health board antimicrobial calculators via the RDS, local Intranet or other local policy route. In terms of RDS amendments, it is not currently possible to change the internet search output, so the following changes are now in progress:

  • The health board name will now be displayed within the calculator and it will be made clear which boards are using the ‘Hartford’ (7mg/kg) higher dose calculator
  • Warning text will be added to the calculator to advise that more than one calculator is in use in NHS Scotland and that clinicians should ensure they access the correct one for their health board. A link to the Right Decision Service list of health board antimicrobial prescribing toolkits will be included with the warning text. Users can then access the correct calculator for their Board via the appropriate toolkit.

We would encourage all editors and users to use the Help and Support standard operating procedure and the Editors’ Teams channel to highlight issues, even if you think they may be temporary or already noted. This helps the RDS team to get a full picture of concerns and issues across the service.

 

2.     New RDS presentation – RDS supporting the patient journey

A new presentation illustrating how RDS supports all partners in the patient journey – multiple disciplines across secondary, primary, community and social care settings – as well as patients and carers through self-management and shared decision-making tools – is now available. You will find it in the Promotion and presentation resources for editors section of the Learning and support toolkit.

3.     User guides

A new user guide is now available in the Guidance and tips section of Resources for providers within the Learning and Support area, explaining how to embed content from Google Calendar, Google Maps, Daily Motion, Twitter feeds, Microsoft Stream and Jotforms into RDS pages. A webinar for editors on using this new functionality is scheduled for 1 May 3-4 pm (booking information below.)

A new checklist to support editors in making all the checks required before making a new toolkit live is now available at the foot of the “Request a new toolkit” standard operating procedure. Completing this checklist is not a mandatory part of the governance process, but we would encourage you to use it to make sure all the critical issues are covered at point of launch – including organisational tags, use of Alias URLs and editorial information.

4.Training sessions for RDS editors

Introductory webinars for RDS editors will take place on:

  • Tuesday 29th April 4-5 pm
  • Thursday 1st May 4-5 pm

Special webinar for RDS editors – 1 May 3-4 pm

This webinar will cover:

  1. a) Use of the new left hand navigation option for RDS toolkits.
  2. b) Integration into RDS pages of content from external sources, including Google Calendar, Google Maps and simple Jotforms calculators.

Running usage statistics reports using Google analytics

  • Wednesday 23rd April 2pm-3pm
  • Thursday 22nd May 2pm-3pm

To book a place on any of these webinars, please contact Olivia.graham@nhs.scot providing your name, role, organisation, title and date of the webinar you wish to attend.

5.New RDS toolkits

The following toolkits were launched during March 2025:

SIGN guideline - Prevention and remission of type 2 diabetes

Valproate – easy read version for people with learning disabilities (Scottish Government Medicines Division)

Obstetrics and gynaecology induction toolkit (NHS Lothian) – password-protected, in pilot stage.

Oral care for care home and care at home services (Public Health Scotland)

Postural care in care homes (NHS Lothian)

Quit Your Way Pregnancy Service (NHS GGC)

 

6.New RDS developments

Release of the redesign of RDS search and browse, archiving and version control functionality, and editing capability for shared content, is now provisionally scheduled for early June.

The Scottish Government Realistic Medicine Policy team is leading development of a national approach to implementation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) as a key objective within the Value Based Health and Care Action Plan. The Right Decision Service has been commissioned to deliver an initial version of a platform for issuing PROMs questionnaires to patients, making the PROMs reports available from patient record systems, and providing an analytics dashboard to compare outcomes across services.  This work is now underway and we will keep you updated on progress.

The RDS team has supported Scottish Government Effective Prescribing and Therapeutics Division, in partnership with Northern Ireland and Republic of Ireland, in a successful bid for EU funding to test develop, implement and assess new integrated care pathways for polypharmacy, including pharmacogenomics. As part of this project, the RDS will be working with NHS Tayside to test extending the current polypharmacy RDS decision support in the Vision primary care electronic health record system to include pharmacogenomics decision support.

7. Implementation projects

We have just completed a series of three workshops consulting on proposed improvements to the Being a partner in my care: Realistic Medicine together app, following piloting on 10 sites in late 2024. This app has been commissioned by Scottish Government Realistic Medicine to support patients and citizens to become active partners in shared decision-making and encouraging personalised care based on outcomes that matter to the person. We are keen to gather more feedback on this app. Please forward any feedback to ann.wales3@nhs.scot

 

 

Obesity in Gynaecology (587)

Warning Warning: This guideline is 380 day(s) past its review date.

Please report any inaccuracies or issues with this guideline using our online form

Obesity is predicted to become the UK’s leading health problem and is more common in women, affecting 26.1% in the UK compared to 16.4% two decades ago (1). It is a risk factor for many gynaecological conditions such as menstrual disorders, PCOS, endometrial pathology, subfertility and pelvic floor dysfunction.

Definitions of Body Mass Index (BMI): kg/m2
Normal BMI 20 – 24.9
Overweight BMI 25-29.9
Obese BMI 30-39.9
Morbidly obese BMI >/= 40

 

BMI should be available before counselling and written consent is obtained as surgical and anaesthetic risks rise with increasing BMI. Many gynaecological conditions will respond favourably to weight loss e.g. menstrual disorders, PCOS, subfertility, prolapse and stress incontinence. Non-surgical management of the obese patient with benign disease is often most clinically appropriate. There should be clear discussion and documentation of which medical treatment options have been offered and whether they were accepted or declined.

In situations where surgery is deemed necessary for benign disease, weight loss is desirable and should be advised. The increased risks of common intra- and post-operative complications such as bleeding, visceral damage, wound infection, thromboembolism and respiratory tract infection should also be discussed and documented.

Pre-operative planning should take place in order to reduce the risk.

  • Requirement for in-patient management will depend on local day surgery BMI limit
  • Obese patients will require longer list time (surgical and anaesthetic)
  • Theatre tables generally support a weight of 300Kg and extenders are available to increase bed width. Local specifications should be ascertained prior to operating on a morbidly obese patient
  • Appropriate measures for moving and handling must be taken eg. appropriate staffing, hover mattresses etc
  • Surgical Equipment – special equipment requirements such as Alexis retractors, long ports/instruments, ligasure / ligasure atlas short etc should be communicated to the theatre team in advance
  • Surgical assistance – the appropriate skill-mix and number of assistants should be arranged
  • HDU/ITU bed should be booked in advance of surgery if likely to be required

Obese women have an increased risk of anaesthetic difficulty and complications, related to their obesity, as well as the presence of medical co-morbidities. Specialist expertise is required to address:

  • difficult venous access
  • difficult airway access
  • co-morbidities (altered cardio-respiratory function/disease, hypertension/IHD, diabetes and obstructive sleep apnoea)
  • altered drug metabolism

Laparoscopic surgery has significantly lower morbidity than open surgery for obese patients however this will depend on the surgical expertise available. Surgery may be more complicated due to:

  • Altered surface landmarks
  • Difficult access – especially with pannus (Risk of collateral damage, complications may be difficult to access and repair)
  • Bowel falls in to view
  • Difficult positioning/slippage with Trendelenberg tilt
  • Higher risk of conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery

Clinical evidence increasingly suggests that alternative laparotomy entry sites ( high transverse avoiding the pannus) may lead to lower SSI (surgical site infection) rates.

Obesity is NOT a contraindication to Enhanced Recovery After Surgery guidance.

Obese patients may require HDU care post-operatively to cater for additional needs in the immediate post-operative period. Forward planning may be required if specialist beds/hoists/commodes/chairs are required in order to aid mobility and reduce risk of post-operative ileus and pressure sores.

The risk of thrombo-embolic disease is increased in the obese patient. Early mobilisation, leg exercises, adequate hydration and correctly fitted anti-embolism stockings (either above or below the knee) as recommended by SIGN 122 should be instituted to reduce risk (2). Weight adjusted dosage of low molecular weight heparin should be given subcutaneously as per the relevant guideline.

Obesity also contributes to a greater risk of post-operative sepsis, in particular surgical site infection. There are no specific recommendations for routine administration of additional prophylactic antibiotics. Early intervention and treatment should be initiated however, should post operative sepsis becomes evident.

Editorial Information

Last reviewed: 18/09/2017

Next review date: 31/03/2024

Author(s): Joy Simpson.

Approved By: Gynaecology Clinical Governance Group

Document Id: 587

References

1) Statistics on obesity, physical activity and diet: England, 2012. NHS Information Centre for Health and Social Care; 2012

2) SIGN 122, Prevention and management of venous thromboembolism, October 2014

3) SIGN 104, Antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery, April 2014.