Skip to main content
  1. Right Decisions
  2. GGC - Clinical Guidelines
  3. Maternity
  4. Back
  5. Antenatal, general
  6. Thromboprophylaxis during Pregnancy and the Puerperium (580)
Important: please update your RDS app to version 4.7.3

Welcome to the March 2025 update from the RDS team

1.     RDS issues - resolutions

1.1 Stability issues - Tactuum implemented a fix on 24th March which we believe has finally addressed the stability issues experienced over recent weeks.  The issue seems to have been related to the new “Tool export” function making repeated calls for content when new toolkit nodes were opened in Umbraco. No outages have been reported since then, and no performance issues in the logs, so fingers crossed this is now resolved.

1.2 Toolkit URL redirects failing– these were restored manually for the antimicrobial calculators on the 13th March when the issue occurred, and by 15th March for the remainder. The root cause was traced to adding a new hostname for an app migrated from another health board and made live that day. This led to the content management system automatically creating internal duplicate redirects, reaching the maximum number of permitted redirects and most redirects therefore ceasing to function.

This issue should not happen again because:

  • All old apps are now fully migrated to RDS. The large number of migrations has contributed to the high number of automated redirects.
  • If there is any need to change hostnames in future, Tactuum will immediately check for duplicates.

1.3 Gentamicin calculators – Incidents have been reported incidents of people accessing the wrong gentamicin calculator for their health board.  This occurs when clinicians are searching for the gentamicin calculator via an online search engine - e.g. Google - rather than via the health board directed policy route. When accessed via an external search engine, the calculator results are not listed by health board, and the start page for the calculator does not make it clearly visible which health board calculator has been selected.

The Scottish Antimicrobial Prescribing Group has asked health boards to provide targeted communication and education to ensure that clinicians know how to access their health board antimicrobial calculators via the RDS, local Intranet or other local policy route. In terms of RDS amendments, it is not currently possible to change the internet search output, so the following changes are now in progress:

  • The health board name will now be displayed within the calculator and it will be made clear which boards are using the ‘Hartford’ (7mg/kg) higher dose calculator
  • Warning text will be added to the calculator to advise that more than one calculator is in use in NHS Scotland and that clinicians should ensure they access the correct one for their health board. A link to the Right Decision Service list of health board antimicrobial prescribing toolkits will be included with the warning text. Users can then access the correct calculator for their Board via the appropriate toolkit.

We would encourage all editors and users to use the Help and Support standard operating procedure and the Editors’ Teams channel to highlight issues, even if you think they may be temporary or already noted. This helps the RDS team to get a full picture of concerns and issues across the service.

 

2.     New RDS presentation – RDS supporting the patient journey

A new presentation illustrating how RDS supports all partners in the patient journey – multiple disciplines across secondary, primary, community and social care settings – as well as patients and carers through self-management and shared decision-making tools – is now available. You will find it in the Promotion and presentation resources for editors section of the Learning and support toolkit.

3.     User guides

A new user guide is now available in the Guidance and tips section of Resources for providers within the Learning and Support area, explaining how to embed content from Google Calendar, Google Maps, Daily Motion, Twitter feeds, Microsoft Stream and Jotforms into RDS pages. A webinar for editors on using this new functionality is scheduled for 1 May 3-4 pm (booking information below.)

A new checklist to support editors in making all the checks required before making a new toolkit live is now available at the foot of the “Request a new toolkit” standard operating procedure. Completing this checklist is not a mandatory part of the governance process, but we would encourage you to use it to make sure all the critical issues are covered at point of launch – including organisational tags, use of Alias URLs and editorial information.

4.Training sessions for RDS editors

Introductory webinars for RDS editors will take place on:

  • Tuesday 29th April 4-5 pm
  • Thursday 1st May 4-5 pm

Special webinar for RDS editors – 1 May 3-4 pm

This webinar will cover:

  1. a) Use of the new left hand navigation option for RDS toolkits.
  2. b) Integration into RDS pages of content from external sources, including Google Calendar, Google Maps and simple Jotforms calculators.

Running usage statistics reports using Google analytics

  • Wednesday 23rd April 2pm-3pm
  • Thursday 22nd May 2pm-3pm

To book a place on any of these webinars, please contact Olivia.graham@nhs.scot providing your name, role, organisation, title and date of the webinar you wish to attend.

5.New RDS toolkits

The following toolkits were launched during March 2025:

SIGN guideline - Prevention and remission of type 2 diabetes

Valproate – easy read version for people with learning disabilities (Scottish Government Medicines Division)

Obstetrics and gynaecology induction toolkit (NHS Lothian) – password-protected, in pilot stage.

Oral care for care home and care at home services (Public Health Scotland)

Postural care in care homes (NHS Lothian)

Quit Your Way Pregnancy Service (NHS GGC)

 

6.New RDS developments

Release of the redesign of RDS search and browse, archiving and version control functionality, and editing capability for shared content, is now provisionally scheduled for early June.

The Scottish Government Realistic Medicine Policy team is leading development of a national approach to implementation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) as a key objective within the Value Based Health and Care Action Plan. The Right Decision Service has been commissioned to deliver an initial version of a platform for issuing PROMs questionnaires to patients, making the PROMs reports available from patient record systems, and providing an analytics dashboard to compare outcomes across services.  This work is now underway and we will keep you updated on progress.

The RDS team has supported Scottish Government Effective Prescribing and Therapeutics Division, in partnership with Northern Ireland and Republic of Ireland, in a successful bid for EU funding to test develop, implement and assess new integrated care pathways for polypharmacy, including pharmacogenomics. As part of this project, the RDS will be working with NHS Tayside to test extending the current polypharmacy RDS decision support in the Vision primary care electronic health record system to include pharmacogenomics decision support.

7. Implementation projects

We have just completed a series of three workshops consulting on proposed improvements to the Being a partner in my care: Realistic Medicine together app, following piloting on 10 sites in late 2024. This app has been commissioned by Scottish Government Realistic Medicine to support patients and citizens to become active partners in shared decision-making and encouraging personalised care based on outcomes that matter to the person. We are keen to gather more feedback on this app. Please forward any feedback to ann.wales3@nhs.scot

 

 

Thromboprophylaxis during Pregnancy and the Puerperium (580)

Warning

Objectives

Please report any inaccuracies or issues with this guideline using our online form

This guideline provides information on how to assess whether women have an increased chance of developing a venous thromboembolism (VTE) during pregnancy and the puerperium. It details the recommended thromboprophylaxis for women with an increased chance of VTE. 

All women should be assessed as to whether thromboprophylaxis is recommended at key points during the antenatal and postnatal periods. Additional assessments may be necessary if new risk factors or transient risk factors are identified. This guideline incorporates information and recommendations relating to VTE prevention and COVID-19 infection.

The care of women presenting with suspected or confirmed VTE in pregnancy is detailed in separate guideline - Thromboembolic Disease in Pregnancy & Puerperium – Acute Management.  

Scope

This guideline, for use by midwives, obstetricians, and other members of the multidisciplinary team in maternity, is based on the principles and recommendations contained within Reducing the risk of thrombosis and embolism during pregnancy and the puerperium – RCOG Green-top Guideline No 37a (April 2015).

Please report any inaccuracies or issues with this guideline using our online form
KEY PRACTICE POINTS
  • Assessment for an increased chance of VTE should, at a minimum, include:
    • Booking
    • 28 weeks
    • During any antenatal in-patient admission
    • Post-birth in the labour ward setting
    • Prior to postnatal discharge
    • During any postnatal readmission
  • Women with an increased chance of VTE should be offered thromboprophylaxis
  • Current weight is important to accurately determine VTE risk score and appropriate prophylactic dose of LMWH
  • A Quick Reference Guide and a Risk Assessment User Guide are included to support the multidisciplinary team (See appendices)

VTE remains a major cause of direct maternal death in the UK (MBRRACE-UK 2021). 

Pregnancy itself predisposes women to VTE and although the absolute risk of VTE in pregnancy is low (1-2 per 1000) [RCOG 2015], the individual likelihood of thromboembolism during pregnancy and the puerperium is influenced by a wide range of factors. The likelihood of VTE can be mitigated by offering women at increased risk thromboprophylaxis.

Factors that increase the risk include pre-existing medical conditions, or circumstances, factors specific to pregnancy and birth. Additionally some risk factors (transient risk factors) may develop and/or resolve during a pregnancy. Therefore ongoing assessment of all women from early pregnancy into the puerperium is an essential part of universal care, leading to timely identification of risk factors and provision of pharmacological prophylaxis (low molecular weight heparin – LMWH) for women at increased risk.

Infection with COVID-19 may be associated with an overall increased risk of maternal VTE. Therefore, infection should be regarded as a risk factor for VTE during pregnancy and the puerperium, and included in the risk assessment. 

Risk assessment for thromboprophylaxis is ongoing throughout pregnancy and should take place during key phases in the woman’s maternity care journey. At a minimum this would include:

  • At Booking
  • At 28 weeks
  • During any antenatal in-patient admission
  • Post-birth in the labour ward setting
  • Prior to postnatal discharge
  • During any postnatal readmission

All women should be reweighed at 28 weeks’ gestation and postpartum to more accurately determine their VTE risk score and the appropriate prophylactic dose of LMWH (MBRRACE 2021).

The following table details the range of factors that increase the likelihood of VTE. 

Risk factors for VTE in pregnancy and the puerperium (RCOG GTG 37a, 2015):

Pre- existing

Previous VTE

Thrombophilia

Heritable

Antithrombin deficiency

Protein C deficiency

Protein S deficiency

Factor V Leiden

Prothrombin gene mutation

Acquired

Antiphospholipid antibodies

Persistent lupus anticoagulant and/ or moderate/ high titre anticardiolipin antibodies and/or ß₂ -glycoprotein 1 antibodies.

Medical comorbidities e.g. cancer; heart failure; active SLE, inflammatory polyarthropathy or inflammatory bowel disease; nephr?oitic syndrome; type 1 diabetes mellitus with nephropathy; sickle cell disease.

Current intravenous drug user

Age > 35 years

Obesity (BMI > 30kg/m² ) either pre pregnancy or in early pregnancy

Smoking

Gross varicose veins (symptomatic or above knee with assoc phlebitis, oedema/ skin changes)

Paraplegia

Obstetric risk factors

Multiple pregnancy

Current pre-eclampsia

Caesarean section

Prolonged labour (> 24hrs)

Mid-cavity or rotational operative delivery

Stillbirth

Preterm birth

Post partum haemorrhage (>1 litre/ requiring blood transfusion)

New onset/ transient

These risk factors are potentially reversible and may develop at later stages in gestation than the initial risk assessment or may resolve and therefore what is important is an ongoing individual risk assessment

Any procedure in pregnancy or puerperium except immediate repair of the perineum, e.g. appendicectomy, post partum sterilization

Bone fracture

Hyperemesis

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

(first trimester only)

Assisted reproductive technology

(ART), in vitro fertilization (IVF)

Admission or immobility  (≥ 3 days bed rest)

e.g. pelvic girdle pain restricting mobility

Current systemic infection

(requiring intravenous antibiotics or admission to hospital)

e.g. pneumonia, pyelonephritis, post partum wound infection

Long distance travel (>4hrs)

The following table details the range of factors that increase the likelihood of VTE (RCOG GTG 37a). 

Each risk factor is allocated a score between 1 and 4. The use of antenatal and postnatal thromboprophylaxis will depend on the total risk score as follows:

  • If total score ≥ 4 antenatally, consider thromboprophylaxis from the first trimester
  • If total score 3 antenatally, consider thromboprophylaxis from 28 weeks
  • If total score ≥ 2 postnatally, consider thromboprophylaxis for at least 10 days
  • If admitted to hospital antenatally consider thromboprophylaxis
  • If prolonged admission (≥ 3 days) or readmission to hospital within the puerperium consider thromboprophylaxis

The total risk score will be calculated automatically in the VTE Risk Assessments section of the electronic patient record (BadgerNet).

For patients with an identified bleeding risk, the balance of risks of bleeding and thrombosis should be discussed in consultation with a haematologist with expertise in thrombosis and bleeding in pregnancy.

Following comprehensive history-taking the Midwife/Doctor will complete and document their risk assessment findings within the woman’s BadgerNet maternity case records. 

Supporting tools include: 

  • Thromboprophylaxis Risk Assessment and Management Quick Reference Guide [Appendix 1]
  • VTE Risk Assessment User Guide 2022 [Appendix 2]
    • This user guide includes additional information to support the interpretation of risk factors
  • Hospital Electronic Prescribing and Medicines Administration (HEPMA)

If the woman is identified as requiring thromboprophylaxis with LMWH it is essential that a care plan is made by a Healthcare Professional (HcP) and documented in the Actual Management Plan section within BadgerNet. The timing of thromboprophylaxis commencement will depend on the number of risk factors (see supporting appendices):

  • Any HcP who is uncertain about the need for thromboprophylaxis or the ongoing management plan of patients should seek assistance from a colleague with an interest in medical disorders in pregnancy.

  • Drug contraindications must be considered.

  • Midwives can assess for and administer thromboprophylaxis. Prescribing thromboprophylaxis is an obstetric/medical remit.
  • Some women, in the postnatal period, may be suitable for midwife administration and supply of postnatal thromboprophylaxis as per the Patient Group Direction (PGD) for enoxaparin. Midwives should refer to the PGD for more details.
  • Women receiving antenatal thromboprophylaxis should be advised that if they experience any vaginal bleeding or once labour begins they should not inject any further LMWH until reviewed by an obstetrician and an ongoing plan of care documented.

  • Breast-feeding is not contraindicated during post-natal thromboprophylaxis management with LMWH.

The LMWH preparation of choice in NHS GGC is enoxaparin. The appropriate dose is calculated from the woman’s most recent weight.

Woman’s most recent weight

Dose of enoxaparin

<50 kg

20 mg daily

50 – 90.9 kg

40 mg daily

91 – 130.9 kg

60 mg daily

131– 170 kg

80 mg daily

>170 kg

0.6 mg/kg/daily

Other LMWH preparations that may be considered (for example if a woman develops an allergic skin reaction to enoxaparin) include dalteparin and tinzaparin. The doses of these LMWHs are also calculated from the woman’s most recent weight.

Woman’s most recent weight

Dose of dalteparin

Dose of tinzaparin (75 units/kg/day

<50 kg

2500 units daily

3500 units daily

50 – 90.9 kg

5000 units daily

4500 units daily

91 – 130.9 kg

7500 units daily

7000 units daily

131– 170 kg

10 000 units daily

9000 units daily

>170 kg

75 units/kg/day

75 units/kg/day

Infection with SARS-CoV-2 may also be associated with an overall increased risk of maternal VTE. This risk is likely to be multifactorial, including a hypercoagulable state associated with the infection, the reduced mobility resulting from self-isolation at home or hospital admission, and other associated obstetric or maternal morbidities (Coronavirus (COVID-19) Infection in Pregnancy – information for healthcare professionals. Version 15. 2022). 

The principles of care include:

  • Women who are self-isolating at home should stay hydrated and mobile.
  • Women should have a VTE risk assessment performed during their pregnancy in line with RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 37a. Infection with SARS-CoV-2 should be considered a transient risk factor and trigger reassessment.
  • If healthcare professionals are concerned about the risk of VTE during a period of self- isolation, a clinical VTE risk assessment (in person or by virtual means) should be performed, and thromboprophylaxis considered and prescribed on an individual basis.
  • Local procedures should be followed to ensure women are supplied with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), particularly where they cannot attend hospital during periods of self-isolation.
  • Thromboprophylaxis initiated for pregnant women who are self-isolating should be continued until they have recovered from the acute illness and are mobilising normally again.
  • All pregnant women admitted with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 should be offered prophylactic LMWH, unless birth is expected within 12 hours or there is significant risk of haemorrhage.
  • For women with severe complications of COVID-19, the appropriate drug and regimen of thromboprophylaxis should be discussed with a multidisciplinary team (MDT), including a senior obstetrician or clinician with expertise in managing VTE in pregnancy.
  • All pregnant women who have been hospitalised and have had confirmed COVID-19 should be offered thromboprophylaxis for 10 days following hospital discharge. A longer duration of thromboprophylaxis should be considered for women with persistent morbidity.

If women are admitted with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 within 6 weeks postpartum, they should be offered thromboprophylaxis for the duration of their admission and for at least 10 days after discharge. Consideration should be given to extending this until 6 weeks postpartum for women with significant ongoing morbidity. 

Thromboprophylaxis during labour and delivery

  • Women receiving prophylactic doses of LMWH during the antenatal period should be reviewed by a Senior Obstetrician before term (37+0 weeks) and a plan for labour/birth documented.
  • It is important to discuss the implications of treatment with LMWH for regional anaesthesia and analgesia with the women before labour or caesarean section – the obstetrician (and/or obstetric anaesthetist) should inform all women taking LMWH about regional anaesthesia and labour. All women should be given access to the patient information leaflet – ‘Information for pain relief during labour or delivery for pregnant patients on blood thinning medications’ (available on Staffnet and on BadgerNet).

Regional anaesthesia or analgesia 

  • This may be considered following discussion with a senior anaesthetist
  • An individual management plan should be documented in the patient’s notes

To minimise or avoid the risk of epidural haematoma

  • Regional techniques should not be used until at least 12 hours after the previous prophylactic dose of LMWH
  • When a woman presents while on a therapeutic regimen of LWMH regional techniques should not be employed for at least 24 hours after the last dose of LMWH.
  • LMWH should not be given for 4 hours after use of spinal anaesthesia or after the epidural catheter has been removed; the epidural catheter should not be removed within 12 hours of the most recent injection.

To be completed for every woman by the Midwife/Doctor:

  • immediately following delivery prior to transfer to postnatal ward
  • on postnatal readmission

The Postnatal VTE Risk Assessment form should be completed on BadgerNet. The result of the VTE Risk Assessment should also be included in the Postnatal Management Plan section within BadgerNet.

Prescription, if required, should be completed in the Hospital Electronic Prescribing and Medicines Administration (HEPMA) prior to transfer to the ward.

Early mobilisation and avoidance of dehydration is recommended for all postnatal women.

For women with a risk score of > 2 postnatally, it is recommended that thromboprophylaxis with LMWH is offered and administered for at least 10 days. LMWH dosage is graduated based on the woman’s most recent weight. 

For women considered to be at higher risk of postpartum VTE (for example women who required LMWH thromboprophylaxis antenatally), the recommended duration of thromboprophylaxis is 6 weeks. VTE risk assessment should be continued in the postnatal period and the decision to extend thromboprophylaxis beyond 10 days should be made by a senior clinician.

Women who require LMWH injection on discharge from the ward setting should be encouraged and supported to self-administer in the community setting.

Women will be shown the correct method by the ward midwife and have the opportunity to self-administer under supervision and this should be documented in the patient’s electronic record. 

The evidence supporting the use of graduated elastic compression stockings is varied. Pregnant women considered to be at an increased risk of VTE and have a contraindication to LMWH, should be advised to wear AES when immobilised/hospitalised during the antenatal period (RCOG 2015, SIGN 2010).

Accurate fitting and careful instruction in the correct application of the hosiery is essential to avoid discomfort and assist rather than prevent venous return.

For women who are risk of VTE postnatally and have a contraindication to LMWH, AES should be considered. Compliance factors should be evaluated and the option of below the knee AES explored. 

Editorial Information

Last reviewed: 25/04/2023

Next review date: 30/04/2026

Author(s): Andrew Thomson, Catherine Bagot.

Version: 2

Approved By: Obstetrics Clinical Governance Group

Document Id: 580