ALL mechanical valve prostheses should be in the higher risk group EXCEPT those patients with a newer generation mechanical valve in the aortic position without any additional risk factors (e.g. structural heart disease, AF, heart failure).
Antithrombotic therapy in patients with replaced heart valves is guided by the type of prosthesis implanted (mechanical or biological), position of the implant, associated risk factors (such as atrial fibrillation), previous thromboembolism, bleeding risk, and the patient's age.
Replacement valves are at highest risk of thromboembolic events in the first 3 months after implantation; so elective non cardiac surgery should be avoided where possible soon after a new valve is implanted.
Patients with mechanical heart valves require lifelong anticoagulant treatment, and patients with first generation valves (with the highest thromboembolic risk) need a higher target INR than patients with single tilting disc prostheses (intermediate thromboembolic risk) or the newer bileaflet prosthesis (lower thromboembolic risk).
First generation valves : older generation aortic valve replacements with high thrombogenicity (1960 to 1985 approx)
- Starr-Edwards
- Bjork-Shiley
- Omniscience
Second generation valves:
- St Jude Medical (1978 onwards)
- Medtronic Hall (with intermediate thrombogenicity - used 1978 to 2000)
Third generation valves:
- Sorin Bicarbon bileaflet valve (1980 onwards)
- ATS valve (1992 onwards)
Thromboembolic events are commoner with prosthetic mitral valves than aortic valves and in patients with double replacement valves compared with those with single replaced valves.