Skip to main content
  1. Right Decisions
  2. Maternity & Gynaecology Guidelines
  3. Maternity
  4. Back
  5. Common obstetric problems, intrapartum labour ward
  6. Umbilical Cord Prolapse (344)
Announcements and latest updates

Right Decision Service newsletter: October 2024

Welcome to the Right Decision Service (RDS) newsletter for October 2024.

1.Contingency arrangements for RDS outages

Development of the contingency solutions to maximise RDS resilience and minimise risk of future outages is in progress, aiming for completion by Christmas. As a reminder, these contingency arrangements  are:

  • Optimising mobile app build process
  • Mobile app always to be downloadable.
  • Serialising builds to mobile app; separate mobile app build from other editorial and end-user processes
  • Load balancing – provides failover (also enables separation of editorial processes from other processes to improve performance.)

 

In the meantime, a gentle reminder to encourage users to download essential clinical toolkits to their mobile devices so that there is an offline version always available.

 

2. New deployment with improvements.

A new scheduled deployment with minor improvements drawn from support tickets, externally funded projects, information related to outages, and feature requests will take place in early December. Key improvements planned are:

  • Deep-linking to individual toolkits within the RDS mobile app. Each toolkit will now have its own direct URL and QR code, both accessible from the app. These can be used to download the toolkit directly where users already have the RDS app installed. If the user does not yet have the RDS app installed, they will be taken to the app store to install the app and immediately afterwards the toolkit will automatically open and download. Note that this will go live a few days later than the improvements below due to the need to link up the mobile front end to the changes in the content management system.
  • Introducing an Announcement Header field to replace the hardcoded "Announcements and latest updates" text. This will enable users to see at a glance the focus of new announcements.
  • Automated daily emptying of the recycling bin (with a 30 day rolling grace period)  in the content management system. A bug preventing complete emptying of the recycling bin contributed to one of the outages earlier this year.
  • Supporting multiple passcodes (ticket 6079)
  • Expanding accordion section to show location of a search result rather than requiring user coming from a search result to manually open all sections and search again for the term.
  • Displaying first accordion section Content text as a snippet on the search results page as a fallback if default/main content is not provided
  • Displaying the context of each search result in the form of a link to the relevant parent tool/section. This will help users to choose which search result is most likely to be appropriate for their needs.
  • As part of release of the new national benzodiazepine quality prescribing guidance toolkit sponsored by Scottish Government Effective Prescribing and Therapeutics, a digital tool to support creation of benzodiazepine tapering/withdrawal schedules.

We are also seeking approval to use the NHS Scotland logo and title for the RDS app on the app stores to help with audience engagement and clarity around the provenance of RDS.

3. RDS Search, Browse and Archive/Version control enhancements

We are still hopeful that user acceptance testing for at least the Search and browse enhancements can take place before Christmas. Thank you for your patience and understanding in waiting for these improvements. Timescales have been pushed back by old app migration challenges, work to address outages, and most recently implementing the contingency arrangements.

4. Support tickets

We are aware that there continue to be some issues around a number of RDS support tickets, in part due to constraints around visibility for the RDS team of the tickets in the existing  support portal. We are investigating the potential to move to a new support ticket requesting system from early in the new year. We will organise the proposed webinar around support ticket processes once we have confirmed the way forward with the system.

Table formatting

There is a known issue with alterations in formatting of some RDS tables which seems to have arisen as a result of the 17 October deployment. Tactuum is working on a fix and on implementing additional regression testing to prevent this issue recurring.

5. New RDS toolkits

Recently launched toolkits include:

NHS Lothian Infectious Diseases

Scottish Health Technologies Group – Technology Assessment recommendations

NHS Tayside Anaesthetics and Critical Care projects – an innovative toolkit which uses PowerAutomate to manage review and response to proposals for improvement projects.

If you would like to promote one of your new toolkits through this newsletter, please contact ann.wales3@nhs.scot

A number of toolkits are expected to go live before Christmas, including:

  • Focus on dementia
  • Highland Council Getting it Right for Every Child
  • Dumfries and Galloway Adult Support and Protection procedures
  • National Waiting Well toolkit
  • Fertility Scotland National Network
  • NHS Lothian postural care for care homes

6.Sign up to RDS Editors Teams channel

We have had a good response to the recent invitation to sign up to the new Teams channel for RDS editors. This provides a forum for editors to share learning, ideas and questions and we hope to hold regular webinars on topics of interest.  The RDS team is in the process of joining participants to the channel and we’d encourage all editors to take part, using the registration form – available in Providers section of the RDS Learning and Support area.

 

7. Evaluation projects

The RDS team has worked with colleagues in NHS Grampian and the Digital Health & Care Innovation Centre to evaluate the impact of the Prevent the progress of diabetes web and mobile app in a small-scale pilot project. This app provides access to local and national resources and services targeted at people with prediabetes, a history of gestational diabetes, or candidates for remission. After just 8 weeks of using the app, 94% of patients reported increased their knowledge and understanding of diabetes, and 88% said it had increased their confidence and motivation to make lifestyle changes, highlighting specific behaviour changes. The learning from this project is informing development of a service model based on tailored support for patient groups with, high, medium and low digital self-efficacy.

Please contact ann.wales3@nhs.scot if you would like to know more about this project.

  1. Training sessions for new editors (also serve as refresher sessions for existing editors) will take place on the following dates:

  • Friday 29th November 3-4 pm
  • Thursday 5 December 3.30 -4.30 pm

To book a place, please contact Olivia.graham@nhs.scot, providing your name, organisation, job role, and level of experience with RDS editing (none, a little, moderate, extensive.)

 

To invite colleagues to sign up to receive this newsletter, please signpost them to the registration form  - also available in End-user and Provider sections of the RDS Learning and Support area.   If you have any questions about the content of this newsletter, please contact his.decisionsupport@nhs.scot  If you would prefer not to receive future newsletters, please email Olivia.graham@nhs.scot and ask to be removed from the circulation list.

With kind regards

 

Right Decision Service team

Healthcare Improvement Scotland

 

The Right Decision Service:  the national decision support platform for Scotland’s health and care

Website: https://rightdecisions.scot.nhs.uk    Mobile app download:  Apple  Android

 

 

Umbilical Cord Prolapse (344)

Warning
Please report any inaccuracies or issues with this guideline using our online form

Umbilical cord prolapse is an obstetric emergency that complicates 0.1 – 0.6% of all deliveries (1% if breech). One major study found perinatal mortality rate of 91/1000.1 Within a hospital setting the majority of fetal morbidity is linked with prematurity and congenital malformations however birth asphyxia is also a cause of morbidity associated with cord prolapse.

Definitions

Umbilical Cord Prolapse = a loop of cord below the presenting part with ruptured membranes whether visible or felt on examination

Umbilical Cord Presentation = a loop of cord below the presenting part with intact membranes.

In practical terms acute management is identical and should be immediate.

Risk factors

The majority of cases of umbilical cord prolapse are seen in women at term with babies of normal birth weight and cephalic presentation however table 1 highlights several clinical features which increase the risk of this obstetric emergency:

Table 1. Risk factors for cord prolapse

General

Procedure related

Multiparity

Artificial rupture of membranes

Low birth weight, less than 2.5kg

Vaginal manipulation of the fetus with ruptured membranes

Prematurity less than 37 weeks

External cephalic version (during procedure)

Fetal congenital anomalies

Internal podalic version

Breech presentation

Stabilising induction of labour

Transverse,  oblique  and  unstable  lie  (when the longitudinal axis of the fetus is changing repeatedly)

Insertion of uterine pressure transducer

Second twin

Polyhydramnios

Unengaged presenting part

Low-lying placenta, other abnormal placentation

Prevention

  • Awareness of Risk Factors. Inform patient of risk if recognised risk factor.
  • With transverse, oblique or unstable lie elective admission after 37+0 should be discussed and women in the community should be advised to present urgently if signs of labour or suspicion of membrane rupture.
  • Always perform an abdominal examination and determine the fetal lie is longitudinal. Only perform forewater amniotomy if you are confident that the head is in the pelvis. If ARM is necessary with a high presentating part ensure there is access to facilities for immediate CS
  • Avoid upward pressure on the presenting part during VE, FBS, ARM.
  • Women with non-cephalic presentation and PPROM should be recommended to have inpatient care.
  • Routine ultrasound examination is not sufficiently sensitive or specific for identification of cord presentation antenatally and should not be performed to predict increased probability of cord prolapse, unless in the context of a research setting.
  • Sensitive ultrasound screening can be considered for women with breech presentation at term who are considering vaginal birth attempt.

Management

Recognition:

  • Cord presentation and prolapse may occur without outward physical signs and with a normal fetal heart rate pattern. Exclude palpable cord at every vaginal examination in labour and after spontaneous rupture of membranes if risk factors are present or if CTG abnormalities commence soon thereafter.
  • Cord prolapse should be suspected where there is an abnormal fetal heart rate pattern (bradycardia, variable decels etc), particularly if such changes commence soon after membrane rupture, spontaneously or with amniotomy.
  • Speculum and/or digital vaginal examination should be performed when cord prolapse is suspected.
  • If no cord pulsation, ultrasound scan should be used to confirm fetal viability. Fetal heart movements may be visualised by ultrasound scan in the absence of cord pulsation.
  • With spontaneous rupture of membranes in the presence of a fixed cephalic presentation, normal fetal heart rate patterns and the absence of risk factors for cord prolapse, routine vaginal examination is not indicated if the liquor is clear.

Call for Help:

  • Activate emergency buzzer to call for assistance. 2222 call and state obstetric and neonatal emergency.
  • If cord prolapse happens out of hospital an emergency ambulance should be called immediately to transfer woman to the nearest consultant-led obstetric unit. Even if birth appears imminent, an ambulance should be called in case of neonatal compromise. Liaise with obstetric unit and inform of emergency and estimated time of arrival.

Relieve Pressure on the Cord;

  • As soon as cord prolapse is recognised cord compression should be minimised by elevating the presenting part.
  • Maternal positioning:
    • Knee-chest, face-down position is traditionally recommended however this is not suitable for ambulance transfer.
    • Exaggerated Sims position (left-lateral with a pillow under the left hip) with or without Trendelenberg (tilted bed so that the woman’s head is lower than her pelvis) may be used instead.
  • Digital Elevation of the Presenting Part
    • Clinician’s gloved fingers should be kept within the vagina to elevate the presenting part.
    • If the cord has prolapsed out of the vagina attempt to gently replace it back into the vagina using a dry pad and with minimal handling. Any handling of the cord can cause vasospasm.
    • Do not attempt to replace cord above the presenting part.
    • There is no evidence to support the practice of covering the exposed cord with sterile gauze soaked in warmed saline.
  • Bladder Filling
    • If decision to birth interval is likely to be long e.g. due to hospital transfer elevating the presenting part through bladder filling may be considered.
    • Insert Foley catheter into the urinary bladder and allow urine to drain. Fill bladder with sterile 0.9% NaCL using an intravenous infusion set. The catheter should be clamped once 500ml has been instilled.
    • Ensure bladder is emptied prior to any method of birth being attempted.
  • Reduce Contractions
    • Stop syntocinon infusion immediately if running
    • Consider tocolysis (Terbutaline 0.25mg s/c) to reduce contractions and improve fetal bradycardia when there is a cord prolapse.

Plan for Birth

  • Immediate transfer to LW
  • Ensure IV access in place and up to date FBC, G&S taken.
  • Assessment for birth:
    • If the cervix is not fully dilated, caesarean section should be performed.
      • A category 1 CS should be performed with aim to deliver within 30 minutes but without compromising maternal safety if there is evidence of fetal heart rate abnormalities. Verbal consent is sufficient.
      • Category 2 caesarean section can be conducted in women in whom the fetal heart rate is normal, but continuous assessment of fetal heart trace is essential. If CTG becomes abnormal recategorisation to category 1 should be immediately considered.
    • If the cervix is full dilated, consider an operative vaginal birth as long as it is anticipated that it would be accomplished quickly and safely.
      • Ventouse or forceps should only be considered if the prerequisites for operative vaginal birth are met.
  • Delayed cord clamping may be considered as long as the baby is uncompromised.
  • Breech extraction may be performed under some circumstances, for example after internal podalic version for the second twin.
  • Prolonged or repeated attempts at regional anaesthesia should be avoided.
  • An experienced neonatal team must be present at birth to ensure full cardiorespiratory support is given to the neonate, if required.

Post Birth

  • Ensure paired umbilical cord gasses are taken
  • Clear documentation of events and times of each method used to alleviate pressure on the cord.
  • Complete an incident reporting form (Datix)
  • Debrief patients on events.

Management at the threshold of viability (23+0 – 24+6)

  • If time: discuss the woman and neonatologists about outcomes for baby and risks to the mother from any interventions.
  • Expectant management should be discussed for cord prolapse complicating pregnancies with gestational age at the threshold of viability.
  • Women should be counselled on both continuation and termination of pregnancy following cord prolapse at the threshold of viability.

Adapted from RCOG Green Top Guideline 50 and PROMPT Cord Prolapse.

Editorial Information

Last reviewed: 01/06/2022

Next review date: 30/06/2024

Author(s): Dr Julie Murphy.

Version: 3

Approved By: Obstetrics Clinical Governance Group

Document Id: 344

References
  1. Murphy DJ, MacKenzie IZ. The mortality and morbidity associated with umbilical cord prolapse. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995;102:826–30.
  2. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Umbilical Cord Prolapse. Green-top Guideline No. 50. London: RCOG;2014 
  3. Module 11. Cord Prolapse. Practical Obstetric Multi-Professional Training. PROMPT. 3rd Cambridge: 2019. p217-227.