Skip to main content
  1. Right Decisions
  2. Maternity & Gynaecology Guidelines
  3. Gynaecology
  4. Back
  5. Gynaecology guidelines
  6. Obesity in Gynaecology (587)
Announcements and latest updates

Welcome to the Right Decision Service (RDS) newsletter for August 2024.

  1. Contingency planning for RDS outages

Following the recent RDS outages, Tactuum and the RDS team have been reviewing the learning from these incidents. We are committed to doing all we can to ensure a positive outcome by strengthening the RDS to make it fully robust and clinically resilient for the future.

We would like to invite you to a webinar on 26th September 3-4 pm on national and local contingency planning for future RDS outages.  Tactuum and the RDS team will speak about our business continuity plans and the national contingency arrangements we are putting in place. This will also be a space to share local contingency plans, ideas and existing good practice. We would also like to gather your views on who we should send communications to in the event of future outages.

I have sent a meeting request for this date to all editors – please accept or decline to indicate attendance, and please forward on to relevant contacts. You can also contact Olivia.graham@nhs.scot directly to register your interest in participating.

 

2.National  IV fluid prescribing  calculator

This UK CA marked calculator is now live at https://righdecisions.scot.nhs.uk/ivfluids  . It has been developed by a multiprofessional steering group of leads in IV fluids management, as part of the wider Modernising Patient Pathways Programme within the Centre for Sustainable Delivery.  It aims to address a known cause of clinical error in hospital settings, and we hope it will be especially useful to the new junior doctors who started in August.

Please do spread the word about this new calculator and get in touch with any questions.

 

  1. New toolkits

The following toolkits are now live;

  1. Updated guidance on current and future Medical Device Regulations

We have updated and simplified this guidance within our standard operating procedures. We have clarified the guidance on how to determine whether an RDS tool is a medical device, and have provided an interactive powerpoint slideset to steer you through the process.

 

  1. Guide to six stages of RDS toolkit development

We have developed a guide to support editors and toolkit leads through the process of scoping, designing, delivering, quality assuring and implementing a new RDS toolkit.  We hope this will help in project planning and in building shared understanding of responsibilities throughout the full development process.  The guide emphasises that the project does not end with launch of the new toolkit. Implementation, communication and evaluation are ongoing activities throughout the lifetime of the toolkit.

 

  1. Training sessions for new editors (also serve as refresher sessions for existing editors) will take place on the following dates:
  • Thursday 5 September 1-2 pm
  • Wednesday 24 September 4-5 pm
  • Friday 27 September 12-1 pm

To book a place, please contact Olivia.graham@nhs.scot, providing your name, organisation, job role, and level of experience with RDS editing (none, a little, moderate, extensive.)

7 Evaluation projects

Dr Stephen Biggart from NHS Lothian has kindly shared with us the results of a recent survey of use of the Edinburgh Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh Anaesthesia toolkit. This shows that the majority of consultants are using it weekly or monthly, mainly to access clinical protocols, with a secondary purpose being education and training purposes. They tend to find information by navigating by specialty rather than keyword searching, and had some useful recommendations for future development, such as access to quick reference guidance.

We’d really appreciate you sharing any other local evaluations of RDS in this way – it all helps to build the evidence base for impact.

If you have any questions about the content of this newsletter, please contact his.decisionsupport@nhs.scot  If you would prefer not to receive future newsletters, please email Olivia.graham@nhs.scot and ask to be removed from the circulation list.

 

With kind regards

 

Right Decision Service team

Healthcare Improvement Scotland

Obesity in Gynaecology (587)

Warning

Please report any inaccuracies or issues with this guideline using our online form

Obesity is predicted to become the UK’s leading health problem and is more common in women, affecting 26.1% in the UK compared to 16.4% two decades ago (1). It is a risk factor for many gynaecological conditions such as menstrual disorders, PCOS, endometrial pathology, subfertility and pelvic floor dysfunction.

Definitions of Body Mass Index (BMI): kg/m2
Normal BMI 20 – 24.9
Overweight BMI 25-29.9
Obese BMI 30-39.9
Morbidly obese BMI >/= 40

 

Pre-operative counselling / consent

BMI should be available before counselling and written consent is obtained as surgical and anaesthetic risks rise with increasing BMI. Many gynaecological conditions will respond favourably to weight loss e.g. menstrual disorders, PCOS, subfertility, prolapse and stress incontinence. Non-surgical management of the obese patient with benign disease is often most clinically appropriate. There should be clear discussion and documentation of which medical treatment options have been offered and whether they were accepted or declined.

In situations where surgery is deemed necessary for benign disease, weight loss is desirable and should be advised. The increased risks of common intra- and post-operative complications such as bleeding, visceral damage, wound infection, thromboembolism and respiratory tract infection should also be discussed and documented.

Theatre planning

Pre-operative planning should take place in order to reduce the risk.

  • Requirement for in-patient management will depend on local day surgery BMI limit
  • Obese patients will require longer list time (surgical and anaesthetic)
  • Theatre tables generally support a weight of 300Kg and extenders are available to increase bed width. Local specifications should be ascertained prior to operating on a morbidly obese patient
  • Appropriate measures for moving and handling must be taken eg. appropriate staffing, hover mattresses etc
  • Surgical Equipment – special equipment requirements such as Alexis retractors, long ports/instruments, ligasure / ligasure atlas short etc should be communicated to the theatre team in advance
  • Surgical assistance – the appropriate skill-mix and number of assistants should be arranged
  • HDU/ITU bed should be booked in advance of surgery if likely to be required

Anaesthetic considerations

Obese women have an increased risk of anaesthetic difficulty and complications, related to their obesity, as well as the presence of medical co-morbidities. Specialist expertise is required to address:

  • difficult venous access
  • difficult airway access
  • co-morbidities (altered cardio-respiratory function/disease, hypertension/IHD, diabetes and obstructive sleep apnoea)
  • altered drug metabolism

Intra-operative surgical considerations

Laparoscopic surgery has significantly lower morbidity than open surgery for obese patients however this will depend on the surgical expertise available. Surgery may be more complicated due to:

  • Altered surface landmarks
  • Difficult access – especially with pannus (Risk of collateral damage, complications may be difficult to access and repair)
  • Bowel falls in to view
  • Difficult positioning/slippage with Trendelenberg tilt
  • Higher risk of conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery

Clinical evidence increasingly suggests that alternative laparotomy entry sites ( high transverse avoiding the pannus) may lead to lower SSI (surgical site infection) rates.

Post-operative care

Obesity is NOT a contraindication to Enhanced Recovery After Surgery guidance.

Obese patients may require HDU care post-operatively to cater for additional needs in the immediate post-operative period. Forward planning may be required if specialist beds/hoists/commodes/chairs are required in order to aid mobility and reduce risk of post-operative ileus and pressure sores.

The risk of thrombo-embolic disease is increased in the obese patient. Early mobilisation, leg exercises, adequate hydration and correctly fitted anti-embolism stockings (either above or below the knee) as recommended by SIGN 122 should be instituted to reduce risk (2). Weight adjusted dosage of low molecular weight heparin should be given subcutaneously as per the relevant guideline.

Obesity also contributes to a greater risk of post-operative sepsis, in particular surgical site infection. There are no specific recommendations for routine administration of additional prophylactic antibiotics. Early intervention and treatment should be initiated however, should post operative sepsis becomes evident.

Editorial Information

Last reviewed: 18/09/2017

Next review date: 31/03/2024

Author(s): Joy Simpson.

Approved By: Gynaecology Clinical Governance Group

Document Id: 587

References

1) Statistics on obesity, physical activity and diet: England, 2012. NHS Information Centre for Health and Social Care; 2012

2) SIGN 122, Prevention and management of venous thromboembolism, October 2014

3) SIGN 104, Antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery, April 2014.