Skip to main content
  1. Right Decisions
  2. GGC - Clinical Guideline Platform
  3. Maternity
  4. Back
  5. Common obstetric problems, maternity assessment
  6. Antepartum haemorrhage (APH) (1036)
Announcements and latest updates

Welcome to the Right Decision Service (RDS) newsletter for August 2024.

  1. Contingency planning for RDS outages

Following the recent RDS outages, Tactuum and the RDS team have been reviewing the learning from these incidents. We are committed to doing all we can to ensure a positive outcome by strengthening the RDS to make it fully robust and clinically resilient for the future.

We would like to invite you to a webinar on 26th September 3-4 pm on national and local contingency planning for future RDS outages.  Tactuum and the RDS team will speak about our business continuity plans and the national contingency arrangements we are putting in place. This will also be a space to share local contingency plans, ideas and existing good practice. We would also like to gather your views on who we should send communications to in the event of future outages.

I have sent a meeting request for this date to all editors – please accept or decline to indicate attendance, and please forward on to relevant contacts. You can also contact Olivia.graham@nhs.scot directly to register your interest in participating.

 

2.National  IV fluid prescribing  calculator

This UK CA marked calculator is now live at https://righdecisions.scot.nhs.uk/ivfluids  . It has been developed by a multiprofessional steering group of leads in IV fluids management, as part of the wider Modernising Patient Pathways Programme within the Centre for Sustainable Delivery.  It aims to address a known cause of clinical error in hospital settings, and we hope it will be especially useful to the new junior doctors who started in August.

Please do spread the word about this new calculator and get in touch with any questions.

 

  1. New toolkits

The following toolkits are now live;

  1. Updated guidance on current and future Medical Device Regulations

We have updated and simplified this guidance within our standard operating procedures. We have clarified the guidance on how to determine whether an RDS tool is a medical device, and have provided an interactive powerpoint slideset to steer you through the process.

 

  1. Guide to six stages of RDS toolkit development

We have developed a guide to support editors and toolkit leads through the process of scoping, designing, delivering, quality assuring and implementing a new RDS toolkit.  We hope this will help in project planning and in building shared understanding of responsibilities throughout the full development process.  The guide emphasises that the project does not end with launch of the new toolkit. Implementation, communication and evaluation are ongoing activities throughout the lifetime of the toolkit.

 

  1. Training sessions for new editors (also serve as refresher sessions for existing editors) will take place on the following dates:
  • Thursday 5 September 1-2 pm
  • Wednesday 24 September 4-5 pm
  • Friday 27 September 12-1 pm

To book a place, please contact Olivia.graham@nhs.scot, providing your name, organisation, job role, and level of experience with RDS editing (none, a little, moderate, extensive.)

7 Evaluation projects

Dr Stephen Biggart from NHS Lothian has kindly shared with us the results of a recent survey of use of the Edinburgh Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh Anaesthesia toolkit. This shows that the majority of consultants are using it weekly or monthly, mainly to access clinical protocols, with a secondary purpose being education and training purposes. They tend to find information by navigating by specialty rather than keyword searching, and had some useful recommendations for future development, such as access to quick reference guidance.

We’d really appreciate you sharing any other local evaluations of RDS in this way – it all helps to build the evidence base for impact.

If you have any questions about the content of this newsletter, please contact his.decisionsupport@nhs.scot  If you would prefer not to receive future newsletters, please email Olivia.graham@nhs.scot and ask to be removed from the circulation list.

 

With kind regards

 

Right Decision Service team

Healthcare Improvement Scotland

Antepartum haemorrhage (APH) (1036)

Warning
Please report any inaccuracies or issues with this guideline using our online form

Definition: bleeding from or in to the genital tract, occurring from 24+0 weeks of pregnancy and prior to birth of the baby.

APH complicated 3-5% of pregnancies – leading cause of perinatal and maternal mortality worldwide.

Risk Factors for APH include:

APH and placental abruption in a previous pregnancy

Threatened miscarriage earlier in their pregnancy

Placenta praevia

Pre-eclampsia

FGR

Polyhydramnios

PPROM

Smoking

Multiple pregnancy

Drug misuse

Advanced maternal age

ART

Causes for APH include:

Unexplained

Placenta praevia

Placental abruption

Uterine rupture

Vasa praevia

Trauma

Cervical lesions

Infection

Malignancy

It is recognised that the volume of blood lost is often underestimated as blood loss may be concealed. It is important to assess for signs of clinical shock as well as fetal compromise or fetal demise as important indicators of volume depletion.

Prompt assessment of maternal and/or fetal compromise is key to establishing if urgent intervention is necessary and will guide your management.

APH Definitions:

Spotting – staining, streaking or blood spotting noted on underwear or sanitary protection.

Minor Haemorrhage – blood loss <50ml that has settled

Major Haemorrhage – blood loss of 50-1000ml, with no signs of clinical shock

Massive Haemorrhage – blood loss >1000ml and/or signs of clinical shock

Recurrent APH – episodes of APH on more than one occasion

Spotting/Minor APH

  • record an accurate, detailed history
    • include onset, amount of bleeding, associated pain, recent intercourse, smear history, associated shortness of breath or dizziness, presence of fetal movements
    • risk factors for placental abruption/praevia should also be sought
  • Record MEOWS – blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, temperature
  • Record urinalysis
  • Gentle abdominal palpation and assessment of fundal height as well as uterine activity
  • Auscultate fetal heart and commence CTG (if over 26 weeks) – if unable to locate FHR with Doppler then USS should be utilised
  • Maternal Rhesus status should be noted
  • Review previous USS reports for documentation of placental site

Speculum Examination/Digital Vaginal Examination

  • Vaginal examination should not be performed until placental site is established
  • In cases of placenta praevia digital vaginal examination should be avoided Placenta Praevia guideline
  • Can be useful to identify cervical dilatation or cause for APH in lower genital tract
  • If clinically suspicious cervix refer to management of cervical abnormalities in pregnancy guideline
  • HVS should be performed if appropriate

Maternal Investigations

  • Should be performed to assess the extent and physiological consequences of APH and will depend on amount of bleeding
  • In minor APH a FBC and G&S should be performed. A coagulation screen is not indicated unless platelet count is abnormal.  BOS Guideline
  • Kleihauer test should be performed in Rhesus D – negative mothers to quantify fetomaternal haemorrhage in order to gauge the dose of anti-D immunoglobulin required. Anti-d

Management

  • Management will depend on severity of bleeding/cause/maternal and fetal compromise
  • Involve senior obstetric consultant/clinician early if concerns
  • Consider IV access (16G) if clinically appropriate
  • Consider antenatal corticosteroid therapy for fetal lung maturation – refer to relevant guidelines
  • All women with APH heavier than spotting and women with ongoing bleeding should remain in hospital at least until bleeding has settled
  • Women presenting with spotting who are no longer bleeding and where placenta praevia has been excluded can go home if initial clinical assessment is reassuring with appropriate consideration to patient’s geographically location.
  • In women with APH >37 weeks gestation consider expediting delivery
  • Following a single episode of APH or recurrent episodes thought to be from a cervical ectropion, subsequent antenatal care need not be altered.
  • Following APH from placental abruption or unexplained causes, the pregnancy should be reclassified in Badgernet as High Risk and antenatal care should be consultant-led with serial growth scans, at least until subsequent growth scans demonstrate normal fetal growth and there is no further risk of APH.

Recurrent APH (more than 1 episode)

  • If recurrent APH, including from unexplained causes, then the pregnancy should be classified in Badgernet as High Risk and antenatal care should be consultant-led with serial growth scans.

Major/Massive Antepartum Haemorrhage

Aims of management:

  • RESUSCITATION
  • DELIVERY and management of Third Stage
  • CORRECT COAGULOPATHY

 

Resuscitation:

  • Resuscitation of the mother is paramount and should be prioritised prior to establishing fetal condition
  • GET HELP – obstetric/anaesthetic/neonatal/haematology
  • Major Obstetric Haemorrhage #2222
  • ABC approach
    • Left lateral tilt
    • Airway = secure airway
    • Breathing
      • apply oxygen - non-rebreathing mask, 15L/min
      • commence pulse oximetry
    • Circulation
      • gain IV access x 2 (16G);
      • Obtain bloods including FBC/Coagulation Screen (including fibrinogen)/Kliehauer/Urea & Electrolytes – send as URGENT and alert laboratory. Consider venous blood gas.
      • Crossmatch as per blood ordering schedule – consider group specific or O negative blood if unable to wait for fully crossmatched blood
      • Commence IV fluids – crystalloid up to 2L; colloid up to 1.5L
      • Continuous pulse and blood pressure recording
      • Consider catheter insertion and monitor urine output hourly
      • Record observations on MOEWS chart
      • Keep the patient warm
    • Assess fetus – CTG/USS

Decide on Delivery

  • Delivery may be needed to control haemorrhage
  • Women with APH and associated maternal and/or fetal compromise are required to be delivered immediately
  • In the presence of maternal and/or fetal compromise delivery should be by Caesarean section with obstetric consultant present (consideration of anaesthetic consultant presence if maternal compromise)
  • Anticipate postpartum haemorrhage – pph link
  • Administer Magnesium Sulphate if gestation <30+0 for fetal neuroprotection. This should not delay delivery if there is evidence of maternal compromise.

Correct Coagulopathy:

  • Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) should be considered
  • Coagulation screen and fibrinogen should be assessed – use near patient testing if available and send samples as URGENT or– alert laboratory.
  • Early liaison with Haematology is paramount
  • Consideration of Fresh Frozen Plasma/Cryoprecipitate

Editorial Information

Last reviewed: 31/12/2021

Next review date: 31/07/2025

Author(s): Julie Murphy.

Version: 1

Approved By: Obstetrics Clinical Guideline Group

Document Id: 1036

References

Antepartum Haemorrhage Green Top Guideline No. 63 RCOG 2011

Practical Obstetric Multi-Professional Training (PROMPT)