Skip to main content
  1. Right Decisions
  2. DGRefHelp - NHS Dumfries & Galloway
  3. Sexual health
  4. Contraception
  5. Back
  6. Copper Intrauterine Device Cu-IUD
  7. Managing problems associated with IUC
Important: please update your RDS app to version 4.7.3 Details with newsletter below.

Please update your RDS app to v4.7.3

We asked you in January to update to v4.7.2.  After the deployment planned for 27th February, this new update will be needed to ensure that you are able to download RDS toolkits even when the RDS website is not available. We will wait until as many users as possible have downloaded the new version before switching off the old system for app downloads and moving entirely to the new approach.

To check your current RDS version, click on the three dots bottom right of the RDS app screen. This takes you to a “More” page where you will see the version number. 

To update to the latest release:

 On iPhones – go to the Apple store, click on your profile icon top right, scroll down to see the apps waiting to be updated and update the RDS app.

On Android phones – these can vary, but try going to the Google Play store, click on your profile icon top right, click on “Manage apps and device”, select and update the RDS app.

Right Decision Service newsletter: February 2025

Welcome to the February 2025 update from the RDS team

1.     Next release of RDS

 

A new release of RDS is planned (subject to outcomes of current testing) for week beginning 24th February. This will deliver:

 

  • Fixes to mitigate the recurring glitches with the RDS admin area and the occasional brief user interface outages which have arisen following implementation of the new distributed technology infrastructure in December 2024.

 

  • Capability to embed content from Google calendar, Google Maps, Daily Motion, Twitter feeds, Microsoft Stream into RDS pages.

 

  • Capability to include simple multiplication in RDS calculators.

 

The release will also incorporate a number of small fixes, including:

  • Exporting of form within Medicines Sick Day Guidance in polypharmacy toolkit
  • Links to redundant content appearing in search in some RDS toolkits
  • Inclusion of accordion headers alongside accordion text in search result snippets.
  • Feedback form on mobile app.
  • Internal links on mobile app version of benzo tapering tool

 

We will let you know when the date and time for the new release are confirmed.

 

2.     New RDS developments

There is now the capability to publish toolkits on the web with left hand side navigation rather than tiles on the homepage. To use this feature, turn on the “Toggle navigation panel” option at the top of the Page settings menu at toolkit homepage level – see below. Please note that publication to downloadable mobile app for this type of navigation is still under development.

The Benzodiazepine tapering tool (https://rightdecisions.scot.nhs.uk/benzotapering) is now available as part of the RDS toolkit for the national benzodiazepine prescribing guidance developed by the Scottish Government Effective Prescribing team. The tool uses this national guidance developed with a wide-ranging multidisciplinary group. This should be used in combination with professional judgement and an understanding of the needs of the individual patient.

3.     Archiving and version control and new RDS Search and Browse interface

Due to the intensive work Tactuum has had to undertake on the new technology infrastructure has pushed back the delivery dates again and some new requirements have come out of the recent user acceptance testing. It now looks likely to be an April release for the search and browse interface. The archiving and version control functionality may be released earlier. We’ll keep you posted.

4.     Statistics

At the end of January, Olivia completed the generation of the latest set of usage statistics for all RDS toolkits. If you would like a copy of the stats for your toolkit, please contact Olivia.graham@nhs.scot .

 

5.     Review of content past its review date

We have now generated reports of all RDS toolkit content that has exceeded its review date by 6 months or more. We will be in touch later this month with toolkit owners and editors to agree the plan for updating or withdrawing out of date content.

 

6.     Toolkits in development

Some important toolkits in development by the RDS team include:

  • National CVD prevention pathways – due for release end of March 2025.
  • National respiratory pathways, optimal cancer diagnostic pathways and cancer prehabilitation pathways from the Centre for Sustainable Delivery. We will shortly start work on the national cancer referral pathways, first version due for release via RDS around end of June 2025.
  • HIS Quality of Care Review toolkit – currently in final stages of quality assurance.

 

The RDS team and other information scientists in HIS have also been producing evidence summaries for the Scottish Government Realistic Medicine team, to inform development of national guidance around Procedures of Limited Clinical Value. This guidance will in due course be translated into an RDS toolkit.

 

7. Training sessions for new editors (also serve as refresher sessions for existing editors) will take place on the following dates:

  • Friday 28th February 12-1 pm
  • Tuesday 11th March 4-5 pm

 

To book a place, please contact Olivia.graham@nhs.scot, providing your name, organisation, job role, and level of experience with RDS editing (none, a little, moderate, extensive.)

 

To invite colleagues to sign up to receive this newsletter, please signpost them to the registration form  - also available in End-user and Provider sections of the RDS Learning and Support area.   If you have any questions about the content of this newsletter, please contact his.decisionsupport@nhs.scot  If you would prefer not to receive future newsletters, please email Olivia.graham@nhs.scot and ask to be removed from the circulation list.

With kind regards

 

Right Decision Service team

Healthcare Improvement Scotland

 

 

Managing problems associated with IUC

Warning

Managing problems associated with IUC

Bleeding

Tranexamic acid or NSAIDs can be offered for management of HMB during use of a Cu-IUD. A 3-month trial of COC can be offered to medically eligible individuals with problematic bleeding during use of Cu-IUD. Medically eligible individuals could have their Cu-IUD removed and an LNG-IUD inserted (or other suitable contraception initiated).

As bleeding patterns will often change with IUC, provision of information about expected bleeding patterns is important. Although unscheduled bleeding may be caused by the IUC itself, other causes (e.g. pregnancy, infection, pathology) should be considered and investigated in line with FSRH Clinical Guideline Problematic Bleeding with Hormonal Contraception. Risk factors for endometrial cancer include older age, raised BMI, early menarche, late menopause, nulliparity, use of HRT, use of tamoxifen, history of polycystic ovary syndrome, diabetes and a family history of endometrial cancer.

New Onset Pelvic Pain 

New-onset pelvic pain in an IUC user should be assessed, and pregnancy should be excluded. There are a number of possible causes for new-onset pelvic pain in an IUC user, many of which are not related to the IUC. A clinical history and physical examination will identify the differential diagnoses and guide the investigation and management. The history will determine the examination and investigations required; however, an abdominal and pelvic examination (speculum ± bimanual examination) and a pregnancy test would usually be required. Due to the potential serious consequences of an ectopic pregnancy, pregnancy should be excluded in all IUC users with new-onset pelvic pain. Other investigations/examinations that may be indicated would be urinalysis, STI screening, measurement of temperature/blood pressure/heart rate, pelvic ultrasound, rectal examination, blood tests. Where alternative causes have been excluded and the individual wishes Cu-IUC removal and replacement, clinicians could consider offering replacement with an alternative device (e.g. switching to a device with a smaller or different-shaped frame). There is, however, insufficient evidence to suggest one particular device over another.

Possible causes if new onset pelvic pain [from FSRH Clinical Guideline: Intrauterine contraception (March 2023)]

 

Gynaecological causes  Other Causes 

IUC malposition/partial expulsion

IUC perforation

Pregnancy (ectopic, miscarriage, labour)

Pelvic inflammatory disease (± abscess/sepsis) 

Ovarian cyst accident 

Appendicitis

Diverticulitis (± sepsis)

Irritable bowel syndrome/constipation

Gastrointestinal infection (± sepsis)

Gastrointestinal obstruction/perforation/necrosis

Urinary tract infection/pyelonephritis (± sepsis)

Hernia

Pregnancy

The risk of any pregnancy, including ectopic pregnancy, during use of Cu-IUD and after insertion of a Cu-IUD for EC is very low. However, among pregnancies that occur with a Cu-IUD in situ, the proportion that is ectopic is greater than among pregnancies occurring without IUC in situ.

A previous ectopic pregnancy is not a contraindication to use of IUC (UKMEC1).

If someone with a Cu-IUD in situ has a positive pregnancy test, follow local assessment pathways.

Explain that the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes (including miscarriage, preterm delivery and septic abortion) is greater than that for pregnancies without an IUC in situ. Removal of the device may improve pregnancy outcomes and is advised when pregnancy is less than 12 weeks’ gestation, as long as the threads are visible or can be easily removed from the endocervical canal. After 12 weeks’ gestation or if  threads are not visible, the decision to remove or retain the device should be considered on an individual basis in conjunction with the obstetric team.

When a Cu-IUD is in situ in pregnancy, the individual’s obstetric/maternity team should be made aware of the presence of the device.

 Infection

Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) occurs as a result of upper genital tract infection, often due to ascending infection from the vagina or endocervix. Chlamydia trachomatis is the commonest causative organism (35% of PID cases). Instrumentation of the uterus for gynaecological procedures, including IUC insertion, can facilitate upward ascent of infection and therefore purulent cervicitis, gonorrhoea and symptomatic chlamydia infection are considered contraindications to IUC insertion (UKMEC4). A sexual history should be taken prior to IUC insertion and screening offered to any individual at risk of an STI. For asymptomatic individuals, testing can be undertaken at the time of IUC insertion. The risk of PID appears to increase in the first 3 weeks after IUC insertion but overall the risk is very low and (<1% of all IUC users)

IUC users with a clinical presentation suggestive of PID should be given antibiotic treatment, managed in accordance with BASHH guidance, and reviewed after 48–72 hours. For individuals with mild-to-moderate PID, whose clinical condition is improving over the first 48–72 hours, the IUC can remain in situ. For individuals whose clinical condition does not improve after 48–72 hours of antibiotics, removal of IUC is normally recommended but should be considered alongside any potential risk of pregnancy if there has been unprotected vaginal sex within the preceding 7 days. An alternative method of contraception should be offered for ongoing contraception, and the need for EC and follow-up pregnancy testing considered. Insertion of IUC when an individual has PID is a UKMEC4. Therefore, for individuals with PID that have their IUC removed but wish another IUC inserted, it is recommended that IUC insertion is delayed until antibiotic treatment has been completed and all signs and symptoms have resolved.

Candida &  Bacterial vaginosis (BV):; IUC users with symptomatic, recurrent, confirmed VVC/BV not controlled by standard management may wish to switch to an alternative method of contraception.

Actinomycosis and presence of actinomyces-like organisms (ALO): Incidental findings of ALO are rare now that liquid-based cytology (LBC) and/or primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is now used for cervical screening. For more information refer to FSRH Clinical Guideline: Intrauterine contraception (March 2023, Amended July 2023)

Malposition

If malposition is  suspected clinically or detected on a scan refer to senior clinician

Advise use of an alternative method of contraception meantime

Perforation

The rate of uterine perforation associated with IUC use is very low, with an overall risk of perforation in the general population of approximately 1–2 per 1000.

Perforation risk  is greater if breastfeeding and postpartum at the time of insertion

Perforation identified at the time of insertion. Stop procedure: remove IUC; monitor blood pressure and pulse rate and level of discomfort monitored until stable. Consider broad-spectrum antibiotics reduce the risk of peritonitis. Offer alternative contraception and advise to seek review if significant pain or signs/symptoms of infection develop.

Delayed identification of perforation. Lower abdominal pain, non-visible threads or changes in bleeding could indicate uterine perforation but are non- specific.

The presence of threads does not exclude perforation as the IUC could have breached the myometrium/other surrounding tissue or perforated the cervix.

Arrange urgent USS ± plain abdominal and pelvic X-ray should be arranged to locate the device. In the interim, consider EC, and offer alternative contraception.

Morbidity associated with detection and removal of an intraabdominal IUC appears to be low but uterine perforation can  involve damage to the abdominal or pelvic viscera, bladder or bowel. If confirmed perforation liaise with gynaecology to consider laparoscopy

Wait at least 6 weeks after a known or suspected uterine perforation before inserting a subsequent IUD. Refer to a specialist service, where ultrasound is available.

Editorial Information

Last reviewed: 31/08/2023

Next review date: 30/09/2025

Author(s): West of Scotland Managed Clinical Network in Sexual Health Clinical Guidelines Group .

Version: 10.1

Reviewer name(s): West of Scotland Managed Clinical Network in Sexual Health.