Skip to main content
  1. Right Decisions
  2. Back
  3. Dermatology pathways
  4. Melanoma
Announcements and latest updates

Welcome to the Right Decision Service (RDS) newsletter for August 2024.

  1. Contingency planning for RDS outages

Following the recent RDS outages, Tactuum and the RDS team have been reviewing the learning from these incidents. We are committed to doing all we can to ensure a positive outcome by strengthening the RDS to make it fully robust and clinically resilient for the future.

We would like to invite you to a webinar on 26th September 3-4 pm on national and local contingency planning for future RDS outages.  Tactuum and the RDS team will speak about our business continuity plans and the national contingency arrangements we are putting in place. This will also be a space to share local contingency plans, ideas and existing good practice. We would also like to gather your views on who we should send communications to in the event of future outages.

I have sent a meeting request for this date to all editors – please accept or decline to indicate attendance, and please forward on to relevant contacts. You can also contact Olivia.graham@nhs.scot directly to register your interest in participating.

 

2.National  IV fluid prescribing  calculator

This UK CA marked calculator is now live at https://righdecisions.scot.nhs.uk/ivfluids  . It has been developed by a multiprofessional steering group of leads in IV fluids management, as part of the wider Modernising Patient Pathways Programme within the Centre for Sustainable Delivery.  It aims to address a known cause of clinical error in hospital settings, and we hope it will be especially useful to the new junior doctors who started in August.

Please do spread the word about this new calculator and get in touch with any questions.

 

  1. New toolkits

The following toolkits are now live;

  1. Updated guidance on current and future Medical Device Regulations

We have updated and simplified this guidance within our standard operating procedures. We have clarified the guidance on how to determine whether an RDS tool is a medical device, and have provided an interactive powerpoint slideset to steer you through the process.

 

  1. Guide to six stages of RDS toolkit development

We have developed a guide to support editors and toolkit leads through the process of scoping, designing, delivering, quality assuring and implementing a new RDS toolkit.  We hope this will help in project planning and in building shared understanding of responsibilities throughout the full development process.  The guide emphasises that the project does not end with launch of the new toolkit. Implementation, communication and evaluation are ongoing activities throughout the lifetime of the toolkit.

 

  1. Training sessions for new editors (also serve as refresher sessions for existing editors) will take place on the following dates:
  • Thursday 5 September 1-2 pm
  • Wednesday 24 September 4-5 pm
  • Friday 27 September 12-1 pm

To book a place, please contact Olivia.graham@nhs.scot, providing your name, organisation, job role, and level of experience with RDS editing (none, a little, moderate, extensive.)

7 Evaluation projects

Dr Stephen Biggart from NHS Lothian has kindly shared with us the results of a recent survey of use of the Edinburgh Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh Anaesthesia toolkit. This shows that the majority of consultants are using it weekly or monthly, mainly to access clinical protocols, with a secondary purpose being education and training purposes. They tend to find information by navigating by specialty rather than keyword searching, and had some useful recommendations for future development, such as access to quick reference guidance.

We’d really appreciate you sharing any other local evaluations of RDS in this way – it all helps to build the evidence base for impact.

If you have any questions about the content of this newsletter, please contact his.decisionsupport@nhs.scot  If you would prefer not to receive future newsletters, please email Olivia.graham@nhs.scot and ask to be removed from the circulation list.

 

With kind regards

 

Right Decision Service team

Healthcare Improvement Scotland

Melanoma

Warning

Cutaneous Melanoma: A skin cancer of the melanocytes in the skin. Melanoma is the third most common skin cancer in the UK. It accounts for more cancer deaths than all other skin cancers combined. Although melanoma is more often diagnosed in older people, it is increasingly affecting younger people. It is the second most common cancer in adults aged between 25 and 49. Most melanomas occur in people with pale skin. Precursor lesions include acquired and large congenital melanocytic naevi (moles), and dysplastic naevi but at least 50% appear with no preceding lesion. Several histologic variants have been recognized, including superficial spreading melanoma, acral lentiginous melanoma, nodular melanoma, and lentigo maligna melanoma.  

 

Please see key messages with scenarios outlining common situations where people have benign lesions that cause some concern and need additional evaluation over time. 

 

Scottish Referral Guidelines for suspected cancer are available at the following link - https://www.cancerreferral.scot.nhs.uk/Home 

Not all treatment options may be listed in this guidance. Please refer to local formulary for a complete list.

Treatment/ therapy

Benign: 

Referral is not usually required for obviously benign lesions, Features which are generally reassuring and suggest a benign lesion include: 

  • Regularity of colour, surface, and border. 
  • Rapid growth over days rather than weeks – common with trauma or inflammation. 
  • 'Stuck on' appearance with keratotic plugs on the surface (suggests a seborrhoeic keratosis). 
  • A pigmented lesion in a child (melanoma is very rare in this age group). 

Risk evaluation: 

Risk evaluation indicating at risk people includes the following: 

  • A personal history of skin cancer.  
  • A family history of skin cancer.  
  • Pale skin (Fitzpatrick Skin Type I and II) that burns easily.  
  • Red, blonde or light-coloured hair. 
  • Blue or green eyes. 
  • History of sunburn, particularly blistering sunburn in childhood. 
  • A large number of moles. 
  • Unusually high sun exposure (living or spending frequent periods in hot countries). 
  • Use of tanning beds or sun beds, particularly if 10 or more sessions.  
  • Increasing age.  
  • Immunosuppression 
  • Pigmented lesions which 'stand out from the crowd' because they are different (the 'Ugly Duckling sign') are a cause for concern, especially if they are changing.  

The Weighted 7-point checklist may be used to assess pigmented skin lesions, and determine referral:  

o Major features of the lesion (2 points each): change in size, irregular shape or border, irregular colour. 

o Minor features of the lesion (1 point each): largest diameter 7 mm or more, inflammation, oozing or crusting of the lesion, change in sensation (including itch). 

o Suspicion is greater for lesions scoring 3 points or more. However, if there are strong concerns about cancer, any one feature is adequate to prompt urgent referral under Urgent Suspicion Of Cancer (USOC) arrangements.

The ABCD(E) system can also be used for pigmented lesion assessment (http://www.pcds.org.uk/clinical-guidance/melanoma-an-overview1) 

 

Refer using a Routine priority (as long as there is no index lesion of concern, where USOC needed) for risk estimation if people are at higher risk of melanoma, such as those with: 

  • Giant congenital pigmented naevi (risk is highest for those measuring 20 cm in diameter or more). 
  • A family history of 3 or more cases of melanoma and/or family history of pancreatic cancer— Those with two cases in the family may also benefit, especially if one of the cases had multiple primary melanomas or the atypical mole phenotype.  
  • More than 100 normal moles. 

Atypical moles, see: https://www.pcds.org.uk/clinical-guidance/atypical-dysplastic-melanocytic-naevus  (particularly if multiple). 

Possible malignant: 

Urgently refer (using USOC, or similar, urgent pathway) to a dermatologist, plastic surgeon, or other suitable specialist with experience of melanoma diagnosis if: 

  • The lesion is suggestive of malignant melanoma (including nodular and amelanotic melanoma). For example: 
  • Lesions scoring 3 points or more (based on major features scoring 2 points each and minor features scoring 1 point each) on the 7-point checklist. However, any one feature is adequate to prompt urgent referral. 
  • New nodules which are pigmented or vascular in appearance. 
  • Nail changes, such as a new pigmented line in the nail or pigmentation under the nail that differs from other nails. 
  • A skin condition is persistent or slowly evolving and unresponsive, with an uncertain diagnosis, and melanoma is a possibility. 
  • A biopsy has confirmed the diagnosis of malignant melanoma. Note: normally such patients would be referred prior to excision. 

A copy of the pathology report should be sent with the referral correspondence, as there may be details (such as tumour thickness, excision margin) that will specifically influence further management.

Scottish Referral Guidelines for suspected cancer are available at the following link - https://www.cancerreferral.scot.nhs.uk/Home 

Referral Management

Benign: 

Manage in primary care. Consider scenarios 1 to 3 in Key messages. Review access to alternative providers for patient access to benign lesion treatments outside the NHS. 

Risk evaluation: 

 

Possible malignant: 

Refer using the USOC pathway for skin cancer. 

 

Scottish Referral Guidelines for suspected cancer are available at the following link - https://www.cancerreferral.scot.nhs.uk/Home 

Clinical tips

  • Lesions change over time and a benign diagnosis at initial assessment may need to be reviewed if the lesion changes. Initial safety netting by check in 3 months against baseline photos is current NICE guidance for lesions with some measure of uncertainty. For itchy benign-appearing lesions causing uncertainty, see scenario 2 in Key Messages. 
  • Photography is key for monitoring of lesions, sharing the diagnostic process and helping patients self-monitor. It improves the quality of the GP record and can be used for teledermatology. See scenarios below illustrating common dilemmas 

Scenario 1  

Low suspicion of malignancy: teledermatology may be used outside the USOC process, where locally available. Include a stable non-changing clinically benign skin lesion, but where the clinical diagnosis is uncertain and doesn’t satisfy 7 point checklist. Suitable photos are essential: 

take at least 3 images of the lesion, once indicated with an inked arrow or circle, including:  

  • regional photograph with lesion indicated with ink.  
  • macro image plane and at an angle.  
  • dermoscopic image with and without gel/polarisation.  

Include core history: 

  • see Risk Evaluation: e.g. evolution, symptoms, skin type, family history, eye colour, episodes of burning, high mole count.  

Scenario 2 

For a pigmented lesion which does not satisfy criteria for referral but is difficult to evaluate, consider the following: 

  • Take a photograph (see scenario 1)  
  • Ask a senior colleague with additional expertise/dermoscopy skills.  
  • Where the lesion is itchy and suspicious for seborrhoeic keratosis take a photo, use emollient and moderate potency steroid for 3 weeks and review to ensure return to previous appearance. 

Scenario 3  

For someone with multiple pigmented lesions which appear benign but give rise to uncertainty: 

  • Highlight with ink (number and arrow) those that warrant monitoring or assessment and take regional /macro/dermoscopy photos. Suggest patient participates in self-monitoring with Apps (review NHS Apps). Failure to number them in regional photo will risk misidentification. 
  • If atypical see “risk evaluation” 

ICD search categories

Malignant 

ICD11 code - 2C30 

Editorial Information

Last reviewed: 24/05/2023

Next review date: 24/05/2025

Author(s): Adapted from the BAD Referral Guidelines.

Version: BAD 1

Co-Author(s): Publisher: Centre for Sustainable Delivery, Scottish Dermatological Society.

Approved By: Scottish Dermatological Society