Skip to main content
  1. Right Decisions
  2. Maternity & Gynaecology Guidelines
  3. Gynaecology
  4. Gynaecology guidelines
  5. Back
  6. Guidelines A-Z (all Gynaecology guidelines)
  7. Women Who Refuse Blood Products, Gynaecology (319)
Important: please update your RDS app to version 4.7.3 Details with newsletter below.

Please update your RDS app to v4.7.3

We asked you in January to update to v4.7.2.  After the deployment planned for 27th February, this new update will be needed to ensure that you are able to download RDS toolkits even when the RDS website is not available. We will wait until as many users as possible have downloaded the new version before switching off the old system for app downloads and moving entirely to the new approach.

To check your current RDS version, click on the three dots bottom right of the RDS app screen. This takes you to a “More” page where you will see the version number. 

To update to the latest release:

 On iPhones – go to the Apple store, click on your profile icon top right, scroll down to see the apps waiting to be updated and update the RDS app.

On Android phones – these can vary, but try going to the Google Play store, click on your profile icon top right, click on “Manage apps and device”, select and update the RDS app.

Right Decision Service newsletter: February 2025

Welcome to the February 2025 update from the RDS team

1.     Next release of RDS

 

A new release of RDS is planned (subject to outcomes of current testing) for week beginning 24th February. This will deliver:

 

  • Fixes to mitigate the recurring glitches with the RDS admin area and the occasional brief user interface outages which have arisen following implementation of the new distributed technology infrastructure in December 2024.

 

  • Capability to embed content from Google calendar, Google Maps, Daily Motion, Twitter feeds, Microsoft Stream into RDS pages.

 

  • Capability to include simple multiplication in RDS calculators.

 

The release will also incorporate a number of small fixes, including:

  • Exporting of form within Medicines Sick Day Guidance in polypharmacy toolkit
  • Links to redundant content appearing in search in some RDS toolkits
  • Inclusion of accordion headers alongside accordion text in search result snippets.
  • Feedback form on mobile app.
  • Internal links on mobile app version of benzo tapering tool

 

We will let you know when the date and time for the new release are confirmed.

 

2.     New RDS developments

There is now the capability to publish toolkits on the web with left hand side navigation rather than tiles on the homepage. To use this feature, turn on the “Toggle navigation panel” option at the top of the Page settings menu at toolkit homepage level – see below. Please note that publication to downloadable mobile app for this type of navigation is still under development.

The Benzodiazepine tapering tool (https://rightdecisions.scot.nhs.uk/benzotapering) is now available as part of the RDS toolkit for the national benzodiazepine prescribing guidance developed by the Scottish Government Effective Prescribing team. The tool uses this national guidance developed with a wide-ranging multidisciplinary group. This should be used in combination with professional judgement and an understanding of the needs of the individual patient.

3.     Archiving and version control and new RDS Search and Browse interface

Due to the intensive work Tactuum has had to undertake on the new technology infrastructure has pushed back the delivery dates again and some new requirements have come out of the recent user acceptance testing. It now looks likely to be an April release for the search and browse interface. The archiving and version control functionality may be released earlier. We’ll keep you posted.

4.     Statistics

At the end of January, Olivia completed the generation of the latest set of usage statistics for all RDS toolkits. If you would like a copy of the stats for your toolkit, please contact Olivia.graham@nhs.scot .

 

5.     Review of content past its review date

We have now generated reports of all RDS toolkit content that has exceeded its review date by 6 months or more. We will be in touch later this month with toolkit owners and editors to agree the plan for updating or withdrawing out of date content.

 

6.     Toolkits in development

Some important toolkits in development by the RDS team include:

  • National CVD prevention pathways – due for release end of March 2025.
  • National respiratory pathways, optimal cancer diagnostic pathways and cancer prehabilitation pathways from the Centre for Sustainable Delivery. We will shortly start work on the national cancer referral pathways, first version due for release via RDS around end of June 2025.
  • HIS Quality of Care Review toolkit – currently in final stages of quality assurance.

 

The RDS team and other information scientists in HIS have also been producing evidence summaries for the Scottish Government Realistic Medicine team, to inform development of national guidance around Procedures of Limited Clinical Value. This guidance will in due course be translated into an RDS toolkit.

 

7. Training sessions for new editors (also serve as refresher sessions for existing editors) will take place on the following dates:

  • Friday 28th February 12-1 pm
  • Tuesday 11th March 4-5 pm

 

To book a place, please contact Olivia.graham@nhs.scot, providing your name, organisation, job role, and level of experience with RDS editing (none, a little, moderate, extensive.)

 

To invite colleagues to sign up to receive this newsletter, please signpost them to the registration form  - also available in End-user and Provider sections of the RDS Learning and Support area.   If you have any questions about the content of this newsletter, please contact his.decisionsupport@nhs.scot  If you would prefer not to receive future newsletters, please email Olivia.graham@nhs.scot and ask to be removed from the circulation list.

With kind regards

 

Right Decision Service team

Healthcare Improvement Scotland

 

 

Women Who Refuse Blood Products, Gynaecology (319)

Warning

Please report any inaccuracies or issues with this guideline using our online form

Background and Beliefs

Most women will accept a blood transfusion if there is a clinical need and they are fully informed. Some patients may refuse transfusion due to specific personal or religious beliefs. The main group of patients who refuse transfusion of allogenic blood or primary blood components (red cells, white cells, plasma and platelets) are practicing Jehovah’s Witnesses.

The Jehovah’s Witness movement is a Christian organisation in which members believe they should not receive allogenic blood due to their interpretation of a passage in the Bible; this is a deeply held core value. It is generally assumed that followers of the Jehovah’s Witness discipline have religious convictions that urge them to decline a blood transfusion, even when conditions are dire. There are also people who may decline a blood transfusion for other personal reasons.

Pre-donation and storage of autologous blood may also not be acceptable to these individuals. Additionally, procedures involving the use of autologous blood such as cell salvage are a matter of personal choice and may depend on whether the equipment is constantly linked to the patient’s circulation and there is no storage of the patient’s blood. However, Jehovah’s Witnesses’ religious understanding does not absolutely prohibit the use of fractions such as albumin, coagulation factors, immunoglobulins and haemophiliac preparations; each Jehovah’s Witness must decide individually if she can accept them (Watchtower 2007).

Unconscious Patients

In the management of an unconscious adult (e.g. ruptured ectopic pregnancy) the status may be unknown. Most practicing Jehovah’s Witnesses will carry a clear Advance Directive/Release card with them at all times. This is a legal document and, if in clear and unambiguous terms, should be respected. Contact could also be made with the patient’s GP who may hold a copy of such an Advance Directive.

Every effort should be made to avoid the use of blood and blood products in the perioperative period under these circumstances, however if a patient is unable to give an opinion, and no applicable advance directive exists, then the clinical judgement of the doctor should take precedence over the opinion of relatives or associates and this may include the administration of blood products. GMC guidance on patients who refuse treatment affirms this stating that: ‘In an emergency, you can provide treatment that is immediately necessary to save life or prevent deterioration in health without consent’ (Personal Beliefs and Medical Practice, paragraph 27 [GMC, 2013]). 

Any blood or blood products administered without prior patient consent should be clearly documented in the casenotes and it is the clinician’s duty to inform the patient about its use and the reasoning for this as soon as possible.

Clinical Management of Adults

Pre-Operative Management:

  • Consideration should be given to non-surgical management of condition where possible e.g. Uterine Artery Embolisation versus Myomectomy; medical management of menorrhagia etc.
  • It is acceptable for a surgeon to refuse to perform an elective procedure on the basis that they feel the risk to the patient from refusal of blood products outweighs the benefits of the procedure provided they refer the patient to another doctor if she wishes, and clearly document the reasoning to avoid accusations of religious discrimination (Personal Beliefs and Medical Practice, GMC 2013).
  • Establish with each Jehovah’s Witness patient which derivatives of the primary blood components are acceptable if any, and also whether procedures involving the patient’s own blood such as cell salvage or haemodialysis are acceptable. Patients should be asked explicitly about situations in which loss of life or limb are likely to confirm that their refusal extends to include these circumstances.
  • Document a clear record in the medical records and care plan regarding what the woman will accept.
  • Complete the Refusal of Blood Transfusion Form and file in the casenotes (to be scanned onto Clinical Portal). Complete the Advanced Directive if this is available.
  • Arrange pre-operative Anaesthetic review.
  • Assess the patient for personal or family history of unexpected bleeding or clotting issues following medical or dental procedures.
  • Avoid any medication that can increase blood loss, including NSAIDs, aspirin and vitamin K antagonists.
  • Establish a plan for emergency management of haemorrhage and damage control strategies for reducing risk to life and limb of the patient. Inform all relevant team members and any external departments that may be required if emergency occurs.
  • Baseline haemoglobin and serum ferritin should be checked well in advance of theatre date to allow early consideration to giving haematinics or parenteral iron if indicated.
  • Early discussion of an individual case with a Haematologist may be beneficial. Consider use of recombinant erythropoietin (EPO) several weeks pre-op.
  • Liaise regarding the availability of cell salvage for the procedure.

Intra-Operative Management

  • Inform Consultant Gynaecologist and Anaesthetist if a patient declining blood transfusion is admitted as an emergency.
  • Each surgical procedure should be managed routinely, by the most senior medical staff available. Junior medical staff should not conduct these procedures unless in an emergency situation where waiting on the arrival of more senior staff would be detrimental.
  • A Consultant Gynaecologist should be present at any surgical intervention if possible.
  • Consider operative approaches or techniques that can minimise the loss of blood and/or interventional radiology.
  • Where appropriate and acceptable to the patient consider the use of intraoperative autologous procedures such as cell salvage (which should be available for all elective procedures if required) and acute normovolaemic haemodilution. Consider early use of coagulation stimulants such as tranexamic acid, recombinant clotting factors (e.g. VIIa, VIII, IX) and desmopressin where appropriate.
  • Meticulous attention to haemostasis throughout the procedure and topical absorbable haemostatic agents may be appropriate.

Post-Operative Care:

  • A post-operative NEWS chart should be commenced and prompt review by medical staff for any score above 3.
  • After discharge, women should be advised to promptly report any increased bleeding.
  • Haematinics should be continued unless blood loss deemed to be minimal. Iron supplementation should be augmented with Folic Acid and Ascorbic Acid supplementation.
  • Thromboprophylaxis risk assessment and therapy should follow standard process.

Management of Haemorrhage:

This should be as for all patients with haemorrhage but with early consideration to the additional aspects below: 

  • Involvement of senior medical staff including the Haematologist
  • Use of IV Tranexamic Acid.
  • If available and acceptable to the patient, cell salvage may be life-saving if there is substantial blood loss.
  • If standard treatment is not controlling the bleeding, she should be advised (if not under general anaesthetic) that blood transfusion is strongly recommended.
  • If the woman dies, debriefing and support should be provided to family and staff involved.

Legal and Ethical Aspects

A competent adult is legally and ethically entitled to accept or refuse any specific treatment or procedure even though this decision may endanger her life. To administer blood in the face of refusal by a competent adult is unlawful, ethically unacceptable and may lead to criminal +/- civil proceedings.

For patients under the age of 16, blood products can be administered in a lifethreatening haemorrhage to prevent lasting disability without patient or parental consent. Two consultants should agree and document the clinical urgency for blood administration. Legal permission for treatment in the face of parental refusal should be sought at the earliest available opportunity.

Any patient is entitled to change her mind about a previously agreed treatment plan.

The doctor must be satisfied that the woman is not being subjected to pressure from others. It is reasonable to ask any accompanying persons to leave the room so that the doctor (with a witness) can ask her if she is making her decision of her own free will. If she maintains her refusal to accept blood or blood products, her wishes must be respected. No other person is legally able to consent to treatment for that adult or refuse treatment on that person’s behalf.

Help and Advice

The Hospital Liaison Committee can be contacted as a resource for more information 24/7 regarding the non-blood management of Jehovah’s Witnesses.

Harry Crawford    
Tel 01355 220674
Mob 07711 367409
harry@harry-crawford.com
John Allum   
Tel 0141 641 6206
Mob 07836 704774
johnallum@hlcglasgow.co.uk
John Flack
Tel 01360 621865
Mob 07775 837513
johnflack0802@aol.com

Editorial Information

Last reviewed: 01/02/2019

Next review date: 28/02/2024

Author(s): Ruth Jewell.

Approved By: Gynaecology Clinical Governance Group

Document Id: 319

References

Protocol For Patients Who Refuse Blood, NHS GG&C 2016 [Staffnet link]

Women Who Refuse Blood Products, Guideline for Management (Obstetrics). NHS GGC Obstetric Guidelines, 2018

Consent Form For the Refusal of Blood Transfusion [Staffnet link]

Jehovah’s Witness Management, Paediatric Patients. GG&C Guideline

Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000. Code of Practice, Scottish Executive. ISBN 0 7557 0396 X

Management of Anaesthesia for Jehovah’s Witnesses – The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland 2005

Haematological Care of the Jehovah’s Witness Patient, Marsh JCW, Bevan DH – British Journal of Haematology 2002, 119, 25-37

Good Medical Practice (GMC, 2013) 

Caring for patients who refuse blood: A guide to good practice for the surgical practice of Jehovah’s Witnesses and other patients who refuse blood. The Royal College of Surgeons of England 2016