Skip to main content
  1. Right Decisions
  2. Maternity & Gynaecology Guidelines
  3. Gynaecology
  4. Gynaecology guidelines
  5. Back
  6. Guidelines A-Z (all Gynaecology guidelines)
  7. Women Who Refuse Blood Products, Gynaecology (319)
Important: please update your RDS app to version 4.7.3

Welcome to the March 2025 update from the RDS team

1.     RDS issues - resolutions

1.1 Stability issues - Tactuum implemented a fix on 24th March which we believe has finally addressed the stability issues experienced over recent weeks.  The issue seems to have been related to the new “Tool export” function making repeated calls for content when new toolkit nodes were opened in Umbraco. No outages have been reported since then, and no performance issues in the logs, so fingers crossed this is now resolved.

1.2 Toolkit URL redirects failing– these were restored manually for the antimicrobial calculators on the 13th March when the issue occurred, and by 15th March for the remainder. The root cause was traced to adding a new hostname for an app migrated from another health board and made live that day. This led to the content management system automatically creating internal duplicate redirects, reaching the maximum number of permitted redirects and most redirects therefore ceasing to function.

This issue should not happen again because:

  • All old apps are now fully migrated to RDS. The large number of migrations has contributed to the high number of automated redirects.
  • If there is any need to change hostnames in future, Tactuum will immediately check for duplicates.

1.3 Gentamicin calculators – Incidents have been reported incidents of people accessing the wrong gentamicin calculator for their health board.  This occurs when clinicians are searching for the gentamicin calculator via an online search engine - e.g. Google - rather than via the health board directed policy route. When accessed via an external search engine, the calculator results are not listed by health board, and the start page for the calculator does not make it clearly visible which health board calculator has been selected.

The Scottish Antimicrobial Prescribing Group has asked health boards to provide targeted communication and education to ensure that clinicians know how to access their health board antimicrobial calculators via the RDS, local Intranet or other local policy route. In terms of RDS amendments, it is not currently possible to change the internet search output, so the following changes are now in progress:

  • The health board name will now be displayed within the calculator and it will be made clear which boards are using the ‘Hartford’ (7mg/kg) higher dose calculator
  • Warning text will be added to the calculator to advise that more than one calculator is in use in NHS Scotland and that clinicians should ensure they access the correct one for their health board. A link to the Right Decision Service list of health board antimicrobial prescribing toolkits will be included with the warning text. Users can then access the correct calculator for their Board via the appropriate toolkit.

We would encourage all editors and users to use the Help and Support standard operating procedure and the Editors’ Teams channel to highlight issues, even if you think they may be temporary or already noted. This helps the RDS team to get a full picture of concerns and issues across the service.

 

2.     New RDS presentation – RDS supporting the patient journey

A new presentation illustrating how RDS supports all partners in the patient journey – multiple disciplines across secondary, primary, community and social care settings – as well as patients and carers through self-management and shared decision-making tools – is now available. You will find it in the Promotion and presentation resources for editors section of the Learning and support toolkit.

3.     User guides

A new user guide is now available in the Guidance and tips section of Resources for providers within the Learning and Support area, explaining how to embed content from Google Calendar, Google Maps, Daily Motion, Twitter feeds, Microsoft Stream and Jotforms into RDS pages. A webinar for editors on using this new functionality is scheduled for 1 May 3-4 pm (booking information below.)

A new checklist to support editors in making all the checks required before making a new toolkit live is now available at the foot of the “Request a new toolkit” standard operating procedure. Completing this checklist is not a mandatory part of the governance process, but we would encourage you to use it to make sure all the critical issues are covered at point of launch – including organisational tags, use of Alias URLs and editorial information.

4.Training sessions for RDS editors

Introductory webinars for RDS editors will take place on:

  • Tuesday 29th April 4-5 pm
  • Thursday 1st May 4-5 pm

Special webinar for RDS editors – 1 May 3-4 pm

This webinar will cover:

  1. a) Use of the new left hand navigation option for RDS toolkits.
  2. b) Integration into RDS pages of content from external sources, including Google Calendar, Google Maps and simple Jotforms calculators.

Running usage statistics reports using Google analytics

  • Wednesday 23rd April 2pm-3pm
  • Thursday 22nd May 2pm-3pm

To book a place on any of these webinars, please contact Olivia.graham@nhs.scot providing your name, role, organisation, title and date of the webinar you wish to attend.

5.New RDS toolkits

The following toolkits were launched during March 2025:

SIGN guideline - Prevention and remission of type 2 diabetes

Valproate – easy read version for people with learning disabilities (Scottish Government Medicines Division)

Obstetrics and gynaecology induction toolkit (NHS Lothian) – password-protected, in pilot stage.

Oral care for care home and care at home services (Public Health Scotland)

Postural care in care homes (NHS Lothian)

Quit Your Way Pregnancy Service (NHS GGC)

 

6.New RDS developments

Release of the redesign of RDS search and browse, archiving and version control functionality, and editing capability for shared content, is now provisionally scheduled for early June.

The Scottish Government Realistic Medicine Policy team is leading development of a national approach to implementation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) as a key objective within the Value Based Health and Care Action Plan. The Right Decision Service has been commissioned to deliver an initial version of a platform for issuing PROMs questionnaires to patients, making the PROMs reports available from patient record systems, and providing an analytics dashboard to compare outcomes across services.  This work is now underway and we will keep you updated on progress.

The RDS team has supported Scottish Government Effective Prescribing and Therapeutics Division, in partnership with Northern Ireland and Republic of Ireland, in a successful bid for EU funding to test develop, implement and assess new integrated care pathways for polypharmacy, including pharmacogenomics. As part of this project, the RDS will be working with NHS Tayside to test extending the current polypharmacy RDS decision support in the Vision primary care electronic health record system to include pharmacogenomics decision support.

7. Implementation projects

We have just completed a series of three workshops consulting on proposed improvements to the Being a partner in my care: Realistic Medicine together app, following piloting on 10 sites in late 2024. This app has been commissioned by Scottish Government Realistic Medicine to support patients and citizens to become active partners in shared decision-making and encouraging personalised care based on outcomes that matter to the person. We are keen to gather more feedback on this app. Please forward any feedback to ann.wales3@nhs.scot

 

 

Women Who Refuse Blood Products, Gynaecology (319)

Warning Warning: This guideline is 412 day(s) past its review date.

Please report any inaccuracies or issues with this guideline using our online form

Background and Beliefs

Most women will accept a blood transfusion if there is a clinical need and they are fully informed. Some patients may refuse transfusion due to specific personal or religious beliefs. The main group of patients who refuse transfusion of allogenic blood or primary blood components (red cells, white cells, plasma and platelets) are practicing Jehovah’s Witnesses.

The Jehovah’s Witness movement is a Christian organisation in which members believe they should not receive allogenic blood due to their interpretation of a passage in the Bible; this is a deeply held core value. It is generally assumed that followers of the Jehovah’s Witness discipline have religious convictions that urge them to decline a blood transfusion, even when conditions are dire. There are also people who may decline a blood transfusion for other personal reasons.

Pre-donation and storage of autologous blood may also not be acceptable to these individuals. Additionally, procedures involving the use of autologous blood such as cell salvage are a matter of personal choice and may depend on whether the equipment is constantly linked to the patient’s circulation and there is no storage of the patient’s blood. However, Jehovah’s Witnesses’ religious understanding does not absolutely prohibit the use of fractions such as albumin, coagulation factors, immunoglobulins and haemophiliac preparations; each Jehovah’s Witness must decide individually if she can accept them (Watchtower 2007).

In the management of an unconscious adult (e.g. ruptured ectopic pregnancy) the status may be unknown. Most practicing Jehovah’s Witnesses will carry a clear Advance Directive/Release card with them at all times. This is a legal document and, if in clear and unambiguous terms, should be respected. Contact could also be made with the patient’s GP who may hold a copy of such an Advance Directive.

Every effort should be made to avoid the use of blood and blood products in the perioperative period under these circumstances, however if a patient is unable to give an opinion, and no applicable advance directive exists, then the clinical judgement of the doctor should take precedence over the opinion of relatives or associates and this may include the administration of blood products. GMC guidance on patients who refuse treatment affirms this stating that: ‘In an emergency, you can provide treatment that is immediately necessary to save life or prevent deterioration in health without consent’ (Personal Beliefs and Medical Practice, paragraph 27 [GMC, 2013]). 

Any blood or blood products administered without prior patient consent should be clearly documented in the casenotes and it is the clinician’s duty to inform the patient about its use and the reasoning for this as soon as possible.

Pre-Operative Management:

  • Consideration should be given to non-surgical management of condition where possible e.g. Uterine Artery Embolisation versus Myomectomy; medical management of menorrhagia etc.
  • It is acceptable for a surgeon to refuse to perform an elective procedure on the basis that they feel the risk to the patient from refusal of blood products outweighs the benefits of the procedure provided they refer the patient to another doctor if she wishes, and clearly document the reasoning to avoid accusations of religious discrimination (Personal Beliefs and Medical Practice, GMC 2013).
  • Establish with each Jehovah’s Witness patient which derivatives of the primary blood components are acceptable if any, and also whether procedures involving the patient’s own blood such as cell salvage or haemodialysis are acceptable. Patients should be asked explicitly about situations in which loss of life or limb are likely to confirm that their refusal extends to include these circumstances.
  • Document a clear record in the medical records and care plan regarding what the woman will accept.
  • Complete the Refusal of Blood Transfusion Form and file in the casenotes (to be scanned onto Clinical Portal). Complete the Advanced Directive if this is available.
  • Arrange pre-operative Anaesthetic review.
  • Assess the patient for personal or family history of unexpected bleeding or clotting issues following medical or dental procedures.
  • Avoid any medication that can increase blood loss, including NSAIDs, aspirin and vitamin K antagonists.
  • Establish a plan for emergency management of haemorrhage and damage control strategies for reducing risk to life and limb of the patient. Inform all relevant team members and any external departments that may be required if emergency occurs.
  • Baseline haemoglobin and serum ferritin should be checked well in advance of theatre date to allow early consideration to giving haematinics or parenteral iron if indicated.
  • Early discussion of an individual case with a Haematologist may be beneficial. Consider use of recombinant erythropoietin (EPO) several weeks pre-op.
  • Liaise regarding the availability of cell salvage for the procedure.

Intra-Operative Management

  • Inform Consultant Gynaecologist and Anaesthetist if a patient declining blood transfusion is admitted as an emergency.
  • Each surgical procedure should be managed routinely, by the most senior medical staff available. Junior medical staff should not conduct these procedures unless in an emergency situation where waiting on the arrival of more senior staff would be detrimental.
  • A Consultant Gynaecologist should be present at any surgical intervention if possible.
  • Consider operative approaches or techniques that can minimise the loss of blood and/or interventional radiology.
  • Where appropriate and acceptable to the patient consider the use of intraoperative autologous procedures such as cell salvage (which should be available for all elective procedures if required) and acute normovolaemic haemodilution. Consider early use of coagulation stimulants such as tranexamic acid, recombinant clotting factors (e.g. VIIa, VIII, IX) and desmopressin where appropriate.
  • Meticulous attention to haemostasis throughout the procedure and topical absorbable haemostatic agents may be appropriate.

Post-Operative Care:

  • A post-operative NEWS chart should be commenced and prompt review by medical staff for any score above 3.
  • After discharge, women should be advised to promptly report any increased bleeding.
  • Haematinics should be continued unless blood loss deemed to be minimal. Iron supplementation should be augmented with Folic Acid and Ascorbic Acid supplementation.
  • Thromboprophylaxis risk assessment and therapy should follow standard process.

Management of Haemorrhage:

This should be as for all patients with haemorrhage but with early consideration to the additional aspects below: 

  • Involvement of senior medical staff including the Haematologist
  • Use of IV Tranexamic Acid.
  • If available and acceptable to the patient, cell salvage may be life-saving if there is substantial blood loss.
  • If standard treatment is not controlling the bleeding, she should be advised (if not under general anaesthetic) that blood transfusion is strongly recommended.
  • If the woman dies, debriefing and support should be provided to family and staff involved.

A competent adult is legally and ethically entitled to accept or refuse any specific treatment or procedure even though this decision may endanger her life. To administer blood in the face of refusal by a competent adult is unlawful, ethically unacceptable and may lead to criminal +/- civil proceedings.

For patients under the age of 16, blood products can be administered in a lifethreatening haemorrhage to prevent lasting disability without patient or parental consent. Two consultants should agree and document the clinical urgency for blood administration. Legal permission for treatment in the face of parental refusal should be sought at the earliest available opportunity.

Any patient is entitled to change her mind about a previously agreed treatment plan.

The doctor must be satisfied that the woman is not being subjected to pressure from others. It is reasonable to ask any accompanying persons to leave the room so that the doctor (with a witness) can ask her if she is making her decision of her own free will. If she maintains her refusal to accept blood or blood products, her wishes must be respected. No other person is legally able to consent to treatment for that adult or refuse treatment on that person’s behalf.

The Hospital Liaison Committee can be contacted as a resource for more information 24/7 regarding the non-blood management of Jehovah’s Witnesses.

Harry Crawford    
Tel 01355 220674
Mob 07711 367409
harry@harry-crawford.com
John Allum   
Tel 0141 641 6206
Mob 07836 704774
johnallum@hlcglasgow.co.uk
John Flack
Tel 01360 621865
Mob 07775 837513
johnflack0802@aol.com

Editorial Information

Last reviewed: 01/02/2019

Next review date: 28/02/2024

Author(s): Ruth Jewell.

Approved By: Gynaecology Clinical Governance Group

Document Id: 319

References

Protocol For Patients Who Refuse Blood, NHS GG&C 2016 [Staffnet link]

Women Who Refuse Blood Products, Guideline for Management (Obstetrics). NHS GGC Obstetric Guidelines, 2018

Consent Form For the Refusal of Blood Transfusion [Staffnet link]

Jehovah’s Witness Management, Paediatric Patients. GG&C Guideline

Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000. Code of Practice, Scottish Executive. ISBN 0 7557 0396 X

Management of Anaesthesia for Jehovah’s Witnesses – The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland 2005

Haematological Care of the Jehovah’s Witness Patient, Marsh JCW, Bevan DH – British Journal of Haematology 2002, 119, 25-37

Good Medical Practice (GMC, 2013) 

Caring for patients who refuse blood: A guide to good practice for the surgical practice of Jehovah’s Witnesses and other patients who refuse blood. The Royal College of Surgeons of England 2016