Skip to main content
  1. Right Decisions
  2. GGC - Clinical Guidelines
  3. Maternity
  4. Back
  5. Antenatal, general
  6. Latent phase labour (409)
March 2025 newsletter now available - see below.

Welcome to the March 2025 update from the RDS team

1.     RDS issues - resolutions

1.1 Stability issues - Tactuum implemented a fix on 24th March which we believe has finally addressed the stability issues experienced over recent weeks.  The issue seems to have been related to the new “Tool export” function making repeated calls for content when new toolkit nodes were opened in Umbraco. No outages have been reported since then, and no performance issues in the logs, so fingers crossed this is now resolved.

1.2 Toolkit URL redirects failing– these were restored manually for the antimicrobial calculators on the 13th March when the issue occurred, and by 15th March for the remainder. The root cause was traced to adding a new hostname for an app migrated from another health board and made live that day. This led to the content management system automatically creating internal duplicate redirects, reaching the maximum number of permitted redirects and most redirects therefore ceasing to function.

This issue should not happen again because:

  • All old apps are now fully migrated to RDS. The large number of migrations has contributed to the high number of automated redirects.
  • If there is any need to change hostnames in future, Tactuum will immediately check for duplicates.

1.3 Gentamicin calculators – Incidents have been reported incidents of people accessing the wrong gentamicin calculator for their health board.  This occurs when clinicians are searching for the gentamicin calculator via an online search engine - e.g. Google - rather than via the health board directed policy route. When accessed via an external search engine, the calculator results are not listed by health board, and the start page for the calculator does not make it clearly visible which health board calculator has been selected.

The Scottish Antimicrobial Prescribing Group has asked health boards to provide targeted communication and education to ensure that clinicians know how to access their health board antimicrobial calculators via the RDS, local Intranet or other local policy route. In terms of RDS amendments, it is not currently possible to change the internet search output, so the following changes are now in progress:

  • The health board name will now be displayed within the calculator and it will be made clear which boards are using the ‘Hartford’ (7mg/kg) higher dose calculator
  • Warning text will be added to the calculator to advise that more than one calculator is in use in NHS Scotland and that clinicians should ensure they access the correct one for their health board. A link to the Right Decision Service list of health board antimicrobial prescribing toolkits will be included with the warning text. Users can then access the correct calculator for their Board via the appropriate toolkit.

We would encourage all editors and users to use the Help and Support standard operating procedure and the Editors’ Teams channel to highlight issues, even if you think they may be temporary or already noted. This helps the RDS team to get a full picture of concerns and issues across the service.

 

2.     New RDS presentation – RDS supporting the patient journey

A new presentation illustrating how RDS supports all partners in the patient journey – multiple disciplines across secondary, primary, community and social care settings – as well as patients and carers through self-management and shared decision-making tools – is now available. You will find it in the Promotion and presentation resources for editors section of the Learning and support toolkit.

3.     User guides

A new user guide is now available in the Guidance and tips section of Resources for providers within the Learning and Support area, explaining how to embed content from Google Calendar, Google Maps, Daily Motion, Twitter feeds, Microsoft Stream and Jotforms into RDS pages. A webinar for editors on using this new functionality is scheduled for 1 May 3-4 pm (booking information below.)

A new checklist to support editors in making all the checks required before making a new toolkit live is now available at the foot of the “Request a new toolkit” standard operating procedure. Completing this checklist is not a mandatory part of the governance process, but we would encourage you to use it to make sure all the critical issues are covered at point of launch – including organisational tags, use of Alias URLs and editorial information.

4.Training sessions for RDS editors

Introductory webinars for RDS editors will take place on:

  • Tuesday 29th April 4-5 pm
  • Thursday 1st May 4-5 pm

Special webinar for RDS editors – 1 May 3-4 pm

This webinar will cover:

  1. a) Use of the new left hand navigation option for RDS toolkits.
  2. b) Integration into RDS pages of content from external sources, including Google Calendar, Google Maps and simple Jotforms calculators.

Running usage statistics reports using Google analytics

  • Wednesday 23rd April 2pm-3pm
  • Thursday 22nd May 2pm-3pm

To book a place on any of these webinars, please contact Olivia.graham@nhs.scot providing your name, role, organisation, title and date of the webinar you wish to attend.

5.New RDS toolkits

The following toolkits were launched during March 2025:

SIGN guideline - Prevention and remission of type 2 diabetes

Valproate – easy read version for people with learning disabilities (Scottish Government Medicines Division)

Obstetrics and gynaecology induction toolkit (NHS Lothian) – password-protected, in pilot stage.

Oral care for care home and care at home services (Public Health Scotland)

Postural care in care homes (NHS Lothian)

Quit Your Way Pregnancy Service (NHS GGC)

 

6.New RDS developments

Release of the redesign of RDS search and browse, archiving and version control functionality, and editing capability for shared content, is now provisionally scheduled for early June.

The Scottish Government Realistic Medicine Policy team is leading development of a national approach to implementation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) as a key objective within the Value Based Health and Care Action Plan. The Right Decision Service has been commissioned to deliver an initial version of a platform for issuing PROMs questionnaires to patients, making the PROMs reports available from patient record systems, and providing an analytics dashboard to compare outcomes across services.  This work is now underway and we will keep you updated on progress.

The RDS team has supported Scottish Government Effective Prescribing and Therapeutics Division, in partnership with Northern Ireland and Republic of Ireland, in a successful bid for EU funding to test develop, implement and assess new integrated care pathways for polypharmacy, including pharmacogenomics. As part of this project, the RDS will be working with NHS Tayside to test extending the current polypharmacy RDS decision support in the Vision primary care electronic health record system to include pharmacogenomics decision support.

7. Implementation projects

We have just completed a series of three workshops consulting on proposed improvements to the Being a partner in my care: Realistic Medicine together app, following piloting on 10 sites in late 2024. This app has been commissioned by Scottish Government Realistic Medicine to support patients and citizens to become active partners in shared decision-making and encouraging personalised care based on outcomes that matter to the person. We are keen to gather more feedback on this app. Please forward any feedback to ann.wales3@nhs.scot

 

 

Latent phase labour (409)

Warning
Please report any inaccuracies or issues with this guideline using our online form

Introduction

Managing the latent phase of labour is without doubt a challenging time for both women and midwives’ alike. Whilst we know that labour happens in stages it is important to remember that there is no such thing as a typical labour or birth – each woman’s experience will be individual and different as will their plan of care. The requirement of support for each woman throughout the latent phase will inevitably be unique and require a person centred, holistic approach.

NICE (2014) defines the latent phase of labour as - a period of time, not necessarily continuous, when there are painful contractions with cervical change. Including cervical effacement and dilatation up to 4 cm.

Most often the first episode of care in early labour will be sought from Triage/Maternity Assessment, whereby women are seeking support and advice via telephone. In this instance communication is key. The RCOG identified a recommendation in their Safer Childbirth (2007) publication, whereby there is a need to improve communication between healthcare professionals and women. Each care provider should foster a team approach based upon mutual respect, a shared philosophy of care and transparent lines of communication.

Midwives are tasked with disseminating large volumes of information to women they care for. The process of education and information sharing, aids women’s decision making, increases their confidence and ultimately enables them to feel empowered. Maxwell (2019) refers to this as “The Midwife Effect”, where midwives have the inherent ability to empower women physically, psychologically and socially. There are 2 defining attributes in the empowerment of women in childbirth - a woman’s belief in herself and a meaningful interconnectedness with carers (Niewehuisze and Warren 2019).

Aim of the Guideline

This guideline is intended to provide a structured support for midwives to assist in supporting women contacting Triage/Maternity Assessment in the latent phase of labour.

Studies report that midwives' attitudes can impact on women. A dismissive or critical attitude can have a negative impact, evoking feelings of fear at home whilst in the latent phase. During initial telephone conversations and face to face contact it is essential for healthcare professionals to be caring and compassionate (Framework for Maternity Services 2016).

Inadequate verbal and written communication is recognised as being the most common root cause of serious errors - both clinically and organisationally. Communication is more effective in teams where there are standard communication structures in place.This is where LATENT can add real value:

Listen Assess Talk Empower Normalise Together

These are the KEY components in communicating critical  information that requires attention  and  action  - thus contributing to effective management with increased patient satisfaction and safety.

Listen - Listen to what the woman is saying. Take a history from her including obstetric, medical and social history. Acknowledge her concerns and rationale for seeking advice. Consider her emotional and psychological needs.

Assess - Use scope of clinical experience to make an appropriate risk assessment. Ask questions to determine clinical condition. Make it a priority where possible to speak with the woman directly, providing safe, effective person centred care.

Talk - Offer the woman your time and the opportunity to talk. Acknowledge and value her feelings and opinions. Offer your support and encouragement. Adopt a person centred approach and give advice that is tailored to meet the needs of each individual. Awareness that there may be barriers to effective communication requiring face to face assessment.

Empower - Offer encouragement and reassurance, identify the woman's physiological and psychological needs. Take a holistic approach and encourage women to take control of their birth experience.

Normalise - Providing there are no additional risk factors and the woman herself feels she is coping and is well supported; encourage her to stay at home. Research shows that fear and anxiety inhibit the labour process and in turn can lead to a cascade of intervention. Therefore, it is important to discuss the benefits of being at home with familiar surroundings.

Together - Collaboratively discuss a plan of care that is both appropriate and acceptable to the woman. Adopt an individualised approach and advise that staff are available to advise and assess at any given interval. Highlight the importance of women making contact if there are any changes to their clinical condition or if they require reassurance.

Risk Assess

Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch (2020) published a National Learning Support Summary whereby some mothers made multiple contacts with maternity triage services. With significant amount of emphasis being spent advising mothers to remain at home, mothers were not being invited into the clinical setting in what was perceived as ‘early labour’, without full assessment of the clinical picture. They frequently interacted with different clinicians each time. Initial documentation was often not adequate to ensure that subsequent clinicians were aware of all the previous information. This hampered clinicians’ decision making, leading them to focus on the issue presented in isolation and not appreciate the cumulative nature of the concerns.

Inviting a woman into Triage/Maternity Assessment should be based upon individual need. There is no validity or clinical rationale that supports a process, where women are only invited into hospital for a face to face assessment in correlation with the number of phone calls they have made.

For some mothers, delaying clinical attendance based on a telephone triage process may prevent them from receiving the care and assessment they needed to support safe management during labour and reduce the risk to their baby. From a thematic HSIB review of investigations, this appeared particularly true for mothers known to have:

  • Group B streptococcus
  • A baby who is small for gestational age
  • A history of reduced/altered fetal movements
  • Women with additional vulnerabilities (BAME, language/communication difficulties, SNIPs etc.)

In all of these situations, early clinical attendance upon signs of labour is important for appropriate care and intervention. Babies who are at increased risk of complications during labour need to be assessed when regular painful unterine activity commences.

Face to Face Assessment

The midwife should undertake a full examination to determine both maternal and fetal wellbeing in relation to the assigned carepathway. The midwife is responsibe for ensuring the minimum level of care is delivered and documented in the Badgernet Smart Assessment form:

  • Maternal observations
  • Urinalysis
  • Abdominal Palpation – fetal presentation/strength/frequency of uterine activity.
  • Auscultation of fetal heart – method of which will be determined by presenting problem, historic care pathway and current risk
  • Pain Assessment – consider the need for (non) pharmacological analgesia. If pharmacological analgesia has been given, complete a medication tab in the BadgerNet
  • Vaginal Examination- determined by clinical assessment.

Any contributing factors that may alter the original pathway of care will require obstetric review +/- further investigations and possible admission to the inpatient ward. An updated care plan and modified risk assesent should be documented in the BadgerNet electronic record.

If after clinical assessment the woman is found to be in the latent phase of labour, with all clinical findings considered normal, requiring minimal dose analgesia (currently 30mg dihydrocodeine) advice should be offered to return home. Studies have shown that hospital admissions in latent phase, subsequently have higher incidences of intervention.

Key factors supporting women in the latent phase of labour who opt to return home:

  • Offer/encourage oral  analgesia  to  a  maximum  of  30mg  dihydrocodeine  in  conjunction  with  regular paracetamol
  • Advice on coping strategies/non pharmacological pain relief
  • Reassurance that events are progressing as normal
  • Provide Patient Information Leaflet
  • Highlight that timeframes to call back are not Labour is unique to each individual who should seek support as they feel necessary
  • Establishing an appropriate social support
  • Encourage light diet, oral fluids and rest where possible

Prolonged Latent Labour

There is no standardised definition for prolonged latent phase. Opinions are polarised in relation to the management. Some believe that it is clinically insignificant, however others consider a possible link and strong assosciaton with subsequent labour abnormalities and high risk outcomes ie. caesarean section.

Malposition may lead to a prolonged latent phase with 10-30% of all babies presenting in the occipito-posterior (OP) position. Prolonged latent phase can be an exhausting and challenging time for women. If any of the following signs and symptoms are evident in a woman who presents:

  • Maternal exhaustion
  • Failure of fetal head to descend into the pelvis
  • Failure of cervical dilatation in the presence of regular uterine activity

Fetal monitoring at regular intervals (currently 6hrly inpatient CTGs on recomendation of senior obstetrician) or earlier if clinical condition indicates. Regular midwifery re assessment should be undertaken in conjunction with this.

If latent phase labour continues in excess of 24hrs, despite appropriate administration of inpatient analgesia, further obstetric review should be sought and consideration given to induction of labour.

Appendix 1: Latent Phase of Labour Algorithms (Green & Red pathways)

Patient Information Leaflet: Latent Phase of Labour

Editorial Information

Last reviewed: 31/12/2021

Next review date: 31/07/2025

Author(s): Gillian McKeown.

Version: 2

Approved By: Obstetrics Clinical Governance Group

Document Id: 409

References

Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch. (2019) [Online]. Available at: https://www.hsib.org.uk/investigations- cases/final-report/ [Accessed 25 January 2020].

Intrapartum care for healthy women and babies Clinical guideline Published: 3 December 2014 www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg190.

Latent phase of labour guideline Royal Berkshire Hospital. Available :https://www.RoyalBerkshire.nhs.uk

Maxwell, C. (2019). ‘The Midwife Effect’, Public Health England. Available at: https://vivbennett.blog.gov.uk/ [Accessed: 02 February 2021].

Niewehuisze, M and Leahy-Warren, P. (2019) ‘Women’s empowerment in Childbirth and pregnancy. A concept analysis’. Available at: https://sciencedirect.com [Accessed: 18 January 2021].

Framework for Maternity Services (2016) ‘Communication’, Standard 22.

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Towards Safer Childbirth: Minimum Standards for the Organisation and delivery of Care in Labour. London: RCOG Press https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/wprsaferchildbirthreport2007

Maxwell, C. (2019). ‘The Midwife Effect’, Public Health England. Available at: https://vivbennett.blog.gov.uk/ [Accessed: 02 February 2021].

Niewehuisze, M and Leahy-Warren, P. (2019) ‘Women’s empowerment in Childbirth and pregnancy. A concept analysis’. Available at: https://sciencedirect.com [Accessed: 18 January 2021].

Framework for Maternity Services (2016) ‘Communication’, Standard 22.

Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch. (2019) [Online]. Available at: https://www.hsib.org.uk/investigations- cases/final-report/ [Accessed 25 January 2020].

Latent phase of labour guideline Royal Berkshire Hospital. Available:https://www.RoyalBerkshire.nhs